Original article
Readability of HIV/AIDS educational materials: the role of the medium of communication, target audience, and producer characteristics

https://doi.org/10.1016/0738-3991(94)90068-XGet rights and content

Abstract

The reading difficulty of many HIV/AIDS brochures and pamphlets limits their effectiveness. This analysis addresses correlates of readability in 136 HIV/AIDS educational items. Readability is measured using the SMOG Index. The medium of communication is significantly related to readability: comic books and brochures are, on average, more readable than books and pamphlets (10.9 versus 11.9). The target audience also differentiates readability. Materials for HIV antibody test seekers, the general community, and sexually active adults have a more difficult reading grade, averaging 12.1, whereas materials for ethnic minorities average a more readable 9.2. The producer organization's type and location are unrelated to readability, but an AIDS-specific organizational focus correlates with better readability (grade 10.8 vs. 11.8). These findings remain significant in multivariate analysis. The results indicate that brochures and comics are more likely to be comprehended by low-literacy populations, that an understanding of the literacy of target audiences is needed to produce materials with appropriate reading levels, and that policies to influence producer organizations may result in the creation of more readable materials.

References (25)

  • GR Klare

    The formative years

  • AT Rabin

    Determining difficulty levels of text written in languages other than English

  • CC Doak et al.

    Teaching patients with low literacy skills

    (1985)
  • Cl Hovland et al.

    Communication and persuasion

    (1953)
  • J Jacoby et al.

    The comprehension and miscomprehension of print communications: an investigation of mass media magazines

    (1987)
  • GH McLaughlin

    SMOG grading: a new readability formula

    J Reading

    (1969)
  • GV Glass et al.

    Statistical methods in education and psychology

    (1970)
  • Systat Inc., 1800 Sherman Avenue, Evanston, IL...
  • Scandinavian PC Systems, 51 Monroe Street, Rockville, MD...
  • R Gunning

    The technique of clear writing

    (1952)
  • RF Flesch

    A new readability yardstick

    J Appl Psychol

    (1948)
  • Cited by (38)

    • Effects of simplifying outreach materials for energy conservation programs that target low-income consumers

      2013, Energy Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our findings show that one of the two brochures became more understandable after simplifying its wording, possibly because its more straightforward topic lent itself better for simplification. Although we followed recommendations to simplify communications to Flesch–Kincaid readability statistics of grade level 5–6 or below (Paashe-Orlow et al., 2003; Wells, 1994), we found that participants who had received the simplified Smart Comfort brochure answered more understanding questions correctly than did those who had received the original version, while there was no significant difference in understanding between those who were given the simplified Watt Choices brochure or its original version. Following previous findings that health communications about complex topics are more difficult to effectively simplify (Finnie et al., 2010; Daraz et al., 2011), this finding suggests that the topic of the Watt Choices brochure was more complex than the topic Smart Comfort brochure.

    • Survey of consumer informatics for palliation and hospice care

      2011, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Large segments of the population, it is clear, would encounter some difficulty in reading the material on most of the sites listed in this paper.19 Comic books work best for some situations, perhaps demonstrating the value of multimedia as well as of simplification of presentation.20 Excellent guides to health literacy are available from the DHHS,21,22 and one hopes that future products will incorporate the DHHS principles.

    • Behavior treatment programs, readability, and treatment outcomes

      2002, Research in Developmental Disabilities
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research was performed while James A. Wells was with the Project HOPE Center for Health Affairs.

    View full text