Original articleThe design of prospective epidemiological studies: More subjects or better measurements?
References (18)
- et al.
Sample size requirements for prospective studies, with examples for coronary heart disease
J Clin Epidemiol
(1989) - et al.
How independent are “independent” effects? Relative risk estimation when correlated exposures are measured imprecisely
J Clin Epidemiol
(1991) - et al.
Blood pressure, stroke and coronary heart disease. Part l, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias
Lancet
(1990) Statistical uncertainty due to misclassification: implications for validation substudies
J Clin Epidemiol
(1988)- et al.
Guidelines to statistical referees
Br Mod J
(1991)An overview of issues related to the correction of non-differential measurement error in epidemiologic studies
Stat Med
(1989)- et al.
A review of the effects of random measurement error on relative risk estimates in epidemiological studies
Int J Epidemiol
(1989) - et al.
Analysis of case-control data with covariate measurement error: application to diet and colon cancer
Stat Med
(1989)
Cited by (58)
Alcohol, microbiome, life style influence alcohol and non-alcoholic organ damage
2017, Experimental and Molecular PathologyCitation Excerpt :Despite best efforts to improve design and analysis of observational studies, some correctly stated that “Proof is impossible in epidemiology” (Conner, 2016). This is primarily due to the limited number of confounders measured in epidemiological studies, and the inevitable measurement errors in assessing both the exposure and the potential confounders (Phillips and Smith, 1991, 1993). The problem is more accentuated in alcohol epidemiological studies because all these studies rely on self-reporting to determine the amount and type of alcoholic beverage consumed, which inevitably introduces recall bias (Klatsky et al., 2014).
A review of five cardiology journals found that observer variability of measured variables was infrequently reported
2008, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyCitation Excerpt :The benefits of improving reliability of measurements have been described by Perkins et al., who showed that improving the reliability coefficient leads to a significant decrease in sample size requirements, and is both time and cost-effective [39]. Exposure measurement imprecision leads to biased estimates of relative risk in prospective epidemiologic studies, and it was recommended that controlling measurement error was at least as high a priority as sample size assessment [40]. Our study has limitations.
Change in incidence and aetiology of intracerebral haemorrhage in Oxfordshire, UK, between 1981 and 2006: a population-based study
2007, Lancet NeurologyCitation Excerpt :Clearly chance effects cannot be excluded in all of these trends, given the small number of cases in each study period. Nevertheless, such detailed analysis is really only possible in smaller studies, and we believe that this study's design is preferable to that of larger studies with routinely collected data.36 Our results have implications for health service provision when predicting the future burden of intracerebral haemorrhage in the UK, as well as the demand for new acute treatments.2
Treating Individuals 4: Can meta-analysis help target interventions at individuals most likely to benefit?
2005, LancetCitation Excerpt :When adjusting for baseline troponin concentration, the sex difference was no longer evident.15 Although such findings are observational in nature, and can be subject to residual confounding and measurement error,40 in this case troponin might be the more important moderator of the effect of PGIs than sex per se. However, troponin data were only available for 35% of the entire population, and when restricting the analysis to this subgroup the unadjusted sex difference was no longer evident.
Systematic Reviews of Epidemiological Studies of Etiology and Prevalence
2022, Systematic Reviews in Health Research: Meta-Analysis in Context: Third EditionCorrelation without a cause: An epidemiological odyssey
2020, International Journal of Epidemiology