SeriesQualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines
Section snippets
Standards
Qualitative research methods involve the systematic collection, organisation, and interpretation of textual material derived from talk or observation. It is used in the exploration of meanings of social phenomena as experienced by individuals themselves, in their natural context.2, 3, 4, 5 Qualitative research is still regarded with scepticism by the medical community, accused of its subjective nature and the absence of facts. Although the adequacy of guidelines has been vigorously debated
Qualitative and quantitative methods
When qualitative and quantitative approaches are combined, the methods are often applied in sequential order. Semistructured interviews or observational data might, for example, be used to explore hypotheses or variables when planning a large epidemiological study, resulting in enhanced sensitivity and accuracy of survey questions and statistical strategy. In such instances, qualitative studies might be thought of as precursors of “real” science. However, qualitative studies can also be added
Conclusions
Medical research needs diversity. We need to prevent methodological separatism and supremacy if the field of medical knowledge is to be expanded, not just strengthened or divided. Responsible application of qualitative research methods is a promising approach to broader understanding of clinical realities. No research method will ever be able to describe peoples lives, minds, and realities completely though, and medical doctors should be reminded that scientific knowledge is not always the most
References (37)
The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers
Lancet
(2001)- et al.
Naturalistic inquiry
(1985) - et al.
Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook
(1994) - et al.
Qualitative research methods in general practice and primary care
Fam Pract
(1995) Inter Views: an introduction to qualitative research writing
(1996)Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research
Qual Inq
(1995)- et al.
Quality in qualitative health research
Criteria for evaluation of qualitative research
Med Sociol News
(1996)- et al.
Reading and evaluating qualitative research studies
J Fam Pract
(1995) - et al.
Rigour and qualitative research
BMJ
(1995)
Users' guides to the medical literature, XXIII: qualitative research in health care—A, are the results of the study valid?
JAMA
Explicit guidelines for qualitative research: a step in the right direction, a defence of the ‘soft’ option, or a form of sociological imperialism?
Fam Pract
Scientific rigour in qualitative research: examples from a study of women's health in family practice
Fam Pract
Reading ethnographic research
Users' guide to the medical literature, XXIII: qualitative research in health care—B, what are the results and how do they help me care for my patients?
JAMA
The view from nowhere
Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective
Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts
Cited by (3014)
Assessment of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) for prasugrel (EFFIENT): A narrative review
2024, American Heart Journal Plus: Cardiology Research and PracticeMethodological Leeway and Obstacles in Qualitative Research: Reflections on Procedural and Practical Issues in Tanzania
2024, International Journal of Qualitative MethodsEncounters with public and professional understandings of Down syndrome: A qualitative study of parents' experiences
2024, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual DisabilitiesChanges to stakeholder engagement approaches throughout a capstone engineering design course
2024, International Journal of Technology and Design Education