Original article
Adolescent heterosexual experience: A new typology

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(96)00182-6Get rights and content

Purpose:

The purpose of this paper is to define a typology that encompasses the full range of adolescent heterosexual behavior; to compare the usefulness of the new typology with that of the traditional dichotomy of “sexually active”/“sexually inactive” for understanding sexual behavior among adolescents; and to determine the implications of the new typology for the design and implementation of HIV prevention programs targeting adolescents.

Methods:

Detailed face-to-face interviews were conducted with a cross-sectional sample of 907 mothers and their adolescents, ages 14–17 years, recruited from public high schools in Alabama, New York, and Puerto Rico. Information from the adolescent survey on precoital sexual behaviors and STD/HIV sexual risk and risk reduction behaviors was examined. A typology of adolescent heterosexual experiences was constructed using four behavioral dimensions.

Results:

Ninety-nine percent (n = 894) of the sample was classified into one of the five patterns of sexual experience: Delayers, Anticipators, One-timers, Steadies, and Multiples. Among the participants who were not sexually active, precoital behaviors differed significantly between the 22% who anticipated initiating sexual intercourse in the next year (Anticipators) and those who did not (Delayers). Among those traditionally classified as “sexually active”, One-timers and Steadies were significantly older when they first had penile-vaginal intercourse than those who had multiple partners. One-timers were more likely to use condoms than Steadies or Multiples, and only Multiples reported previous STDs.

Conclusion:

A typology that defines a range of adolescent heterosexual experiences was developed, and it was possible to classify 99% of our sample. The traditional dichotomy between “sexually active” vs. “not active” hides important behavioral intentions and sexual practices. These differences must be taken into account in the development and implementation of HIV prevention programs that target adolescents.

References (30)

  • The Social Science Research Council

    Sexuality research in the United States: an assessment of the social and behavioral sciences

    (1995)
  • AralS

    Sexual behavior in sexually transmitted disease research: An overview

    Sexually Transm Dis

    (1994)
  • CooperML et al.

    Substance use and sexual risk taking among black adolescents and white adolescents

    Health Psychology

    (1994)
  • LowryR et al.

    Substance use and HIV-related sexual behaviors among US high school students: are they related?

    Am J Public Health

    (1994)
  • OverbyKJ et al.

    The impact of AIDS on an urban population of high-risk female minority adolescents: implications for intervention

    J Adolesc Health

    (1994)
  • Cited by (65)

    • Sexuality in adolescent: counseling

      2015, Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes
    • Approach to adolescence sexuality

      2015, Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes
    • Family and peer support matter for precoital and coital behaviors among adolescents in Lima

      2014, Journal of Adolescence
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, accompanying practices such as non-use of condoms is both unhealthy and negative. In other contexts, precoital behaviors have been found to predict sexual initiation (Miller et al., 1997). Additionally, in past studies in Peru, condom use was low, at 26–38% (Cáceres, 1999; Magnani et al., 2001) and in this study, condom use at first sex was similarly low (32%).

    • It's Your Game: Keep It Real: Delaying Sexual Behavior with an Effective Middle School Program

      2010, Journal of Adolescent Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      Secondary outcome measures examined the impact of the intervention on (1) delayed initiation of specific types of sex (oral, vaginal, anal); (2) delayed sexual initiation by gender and racial/ethnicity; and (3) reduced risk behavior at the ninth-grade follow-up for those who reported being sexually active in the last 3 months. Additional endpoints were assessed for sexually active students All sexual behavior measures were adapted from existing surveys and extensively pilot tested among urban middle school populations [20–23]. Psychosocial variables based on social cognitive theories were also assessed, using measures adapted from existing surveys and extensively pilot tested [9,20,21,24,25].

    • Exposure to Sexual Lyrics and Sexual Experience Among Urban Adolescents

      2009, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      For the survey, sexual intercourse was defined as when a boy puts his penis in a girl's vagina. A validated scale was also used to measure an adolescent's progression along a noncoital sexual continuum.25 The adolescent received a score of 0 if he or she had never kissed; 1 if he or she had kissed only; 2 if he or she had “made out” (defined for the participant in parentheses as kissed for a long time); 3 if the respondent had touched breasts or had breasts touched; 4 if he or she had touched genitals or had genitals touched; and 5 if he or she had given or received oral sex.25

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text