Original studies
Self-collected Vaginal Swabs for the Detection of Multiple Sexually Transmitted Infections in Adolescent Girls

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1083-3188(02)00197-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the use of self-collected vaginal swabs to test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Trichomonas vaginalis, and to describe the acceptability of this technique to adolescents.

Design: Comparison of a new protocol for sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing with the current standard of care, using the same subjects. Survey of attitudes regarding the self-collection technique.

Setting: A juvenile correctional facility in western Pennsylvania.

Participants: Convenience sample of 133 detainees, 12–17 years of age.

Intervention: Girls were invited to undergo STI screening using a self-collected vaginal swab. Polymerase chain reaction was used to test this specimen for each of the above three infections. Pelvic exams and endocervical testing were performed at the discretion of the physician performing the intake physical, independent of the study.

Main Outcome Measures: The number of infections diagnosed using the self-testing protocol, compared to the number diagnosed using standard practices; acceptability of the self-collection technique.

Results: Twenty-four percent of sexually active subjects had one or more infections diagnosed by self-testing: 11.3% had C. trachomatis, 8.5% had N. gonorrhoeae, and 11.7% had T. vaginalis. Only 30% of subjects with infections had pelvic exams while detained; therefore 70% of girls with infections would have been missed in the absence of the self-testing option. The self-collection technique was acceptable to 95% of subjects.

Conclusions: STI testing using self-collected vaginal specimens is highly acceptable to adolescent girls, and can dramatically increase the detection rate for these three treatable infections when pelvic exams are not performed.

Introduction

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are common in adolescents, with an estimated 25% of sexually experienced teens developing at least one STI prior to graduating from high school.1 Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis can cause infections that may progress to pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and its sequelae, including chronic pelvic pain, ectopic pregnancy, and infertility. Screening for C. trachomatis in at-risk populations has been shown to reduce the incidence of PID.2 Trichomonas vaginalis, a sexually transmitted parasite, is known to cause vaginitis and an increased risk of premature labor in pregnant women; it may also increase transmission of other sexually transmitted pathogens including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).3, 4, 5 All of these infections are asymptomatic in a significant proportion of infected women. However, even asymptomatic infections can be associated with considerable morbidity.

Studies of teens in juvenile detention centers demonstrate that this is a particularly high-risk population, with STI prevalence ranging from 9% to 48%.6, 7, 8 Many of these recent studies used nucleic acid amplification (NAA) tests such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or ligase chain reaction (LCR) on urine samples to screen for N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis. The sensitivity of LCR for urine specimens compared to culture or NAA of endocervical specimens is 50%–95% for gonococcal infections and 79%–96% for chlamydial infections.9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 Though methodologies among these studies vary, most demonstrate sensitivities in the 85%–95% range. In the detention setting, time and personnel constraints may limit the ability to perform speculum exams for endocervical screening of all female detainees. The prospect of performing noninvasive tests for these two pathogens is therefore attractive, as it may substantially increase the yield of infections identified and treated.

Several studies have shown that vaginal introital specimens obtained by patients are useful in the diagnosis of N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis when analyzed using PCR or LCR.16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 Since both of these organisms infect the columnar epithelial cells of the endocervix and cause cellular damage, it is not surprising that their nucleic acids can subsequently be detected in vaginal fluid. The reported sensitivities and specificities of this method, when compared to endocervical specimens, are 81%–100% and 93%–99%, respectively. All of the above studies included adolescent as well as adult women. The vaginal introitus has also been shown to be an appropriate testing site for T. vaginalis using PCR or culture.22, 23, 24 PCR testing for N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, and T. vaginalis can be performed using a single swab specimen. The present study describes the use of this technique to screen female adolescent detainees for all three organisms in a setting where universal screening with speculum exams is not feasible. We hypothesized that more infections would be diagnosed and treated when this screening was available than would be identified by standard care practices, and that self-testing for STIs would be highly acceptable and preferable in this population.

Section snippets

Setting

The study took place in the juvenile correctional facility serving Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, between October 1998 and July 1999. Youths aged 10 to 17 yrs are detained at this facility for periods of one day to several months. Every detainee receives an intake physical within 48 hours of admission. Male detainees are screened for urethritis with a urine leukocyte esterase test, but no universal STI screening mechanism is in place for females. If a pelvic exam is not indicated based on

Results

Of the 161 girls approached for participation, 137 (85%) agreed to perform self-testing. Four of these girls were treated for an STI within the past three weeks; therefore 133 subjects were included in the final analysis. Average age was 15.3 yrs ± 1.2 yrs. Additional demographic information is presented in Table 1. Eighty-five percent (113/133) of the subjects were sexually experienced. Their characteristics are further described in Table 2. Although 17% of sexually active subjects had never

Discussion

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have included sexually transmitted diseases as one of the Healthy People 2010 Focus Areas. Objectives under this Focus Area include reducing the proportion of adolescents and young adults with C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infections. In addition, HEDIS (Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set) has included the percentage of sexually active women aged 15–25 yrs who are screened for chlamydial infection as a measure of appropriate care for

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ms. Kathleen McGinnis, Dr. Jeanne Jordan, and Dr. Janine Janosky for their valuable contributions to this project.

This study was supported in part by the General Clinical Research Center of Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh (NIH Grant 5M01 RR00084) and the Family Planning Council. Materials for N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis testing were provided by Roche Diagnostics.

Dr. Cynthia Holland-Hall served briefly on the PCR Advisory Board for Roche Diagnostics, and

References (37)

  • M Laga et al.

    Non-ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases as risk factors for HIV-1 transmission in womenresults from a cohort study

    AIDS

    (1993)
  • V.D Wood et al.

    Sexually transmitted disease among adolescents in the juvenile justice system of the District of Columbia

    J Natl Med Assoc

    (1993)
  • T.A Bell et al.

    Sexually transmitted diseases in females in a juvenile detention center

    Sex Transm Dis

    (1985)
  • M.K Oh et al.

    Urine-based screening of adolescents in detention to guide treatment for gonococcal and chlamydial infections. Translating research into intervention

    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med

    (1998)
  • M Buimer et al.

    Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by ligase chain reaction–based assays with clinical specimens from various sitesimplications for diagnostic testing and screening

    J Clin Microbiol

    (1996)
  • K Xu et al.

    Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection by ligase chain reaction testing of urine among adolescent women with and without Chlamydia trachomatis infection

    Sex Transm Dis

    (1998)
  • K.R Smith et al.

    Evaluation of ligase chain reaction for use with urine for identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in females attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic

    J Clin Microbiol

    (1995)
  • C.A Gaydos et al.

    Use of ligase chain reaction with urine vs. cervical culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in an asymptomatic military population of pregnant and nonpregnant females attending Papanicolaou smear clinics

    J Clin Microbiol

    (1998)
  • Cited by (56)

    • The health of adolescents in detention: a global scoping review

      2020, The Lancet Public Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additionally, the high prevalence of pelvic inflammatory disease66,130 increases the risk of reproductive complications in this population in the future. Several studies have shown that high proportions of young detained females have experienced childhood sexual abuse or intimate partner violence,77,153 suggesting a need for trauma-informed approaches to sexual health (eg, allowing self-collected specimens rather than pairing STI screening with gynaecological examinations, and being able to request examination by a doctor of the same gender)130 in this population. We documented a high prevalence of current (2–7%) and previous (20–37%) pregnancies in detained adolescent females and a high proportion of adolescent males who had fathered a child or been responsible for pregnancy (22–31%), all of whom were teenagers when they commenced their current detention.

    • Self-collected nasal swabs to detect infection and colonization: A useful tool for population-based epidemiological studies?

      2011, International Journal of Infectious Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      An attractive alternative approach would be to ask the participants to perform the swabs themselves (‘self-swabbing’). There is ample evidence from various clinical scenarios demonstrating the feasibility of self-swabbing among specific risk groups and patient populations.6–10 Self-swabbing has several advantages over the collection of samples by study personnel.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text