Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial bridging in a network of drug-using male sex workers

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study sought to determine whether drug-using male sex workers (MSWs) spatially bridge sexual networks across cities and to determine whether the behaviors of MSWs who bridge differ from the behaviors of those who do not. Data were collected from 42 MSWs in Houston, Texas, between May 2003 and February 2004. Spatial bridging was defined as having traded sex for money in another city before traveling to and trading in Houston. Cities bridged by MSWs were geographically plotted and were primarily located in the Gulf Coast and in Florida. Slightly less than half of MSWs were identified as spatially bridging from one city to another. A significantly higher proportion of MSWs who bridged cities were homosexual (55% vs. 23%) and HIV positive (31% vs. 5%). Those who bridged cities used marijuana and injected drugs more frequently and had significantly more male sex partners than MSWs who did not bridge cities. Despite the small sample size, this study found that many drug-using MSWs spatially bridge sexual networks in cities where they trade sex for money.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scott J. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage Publications; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wasserman S, Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Laumann E, Ellingson S, Mahay J, Paik A, Youm Y. The Sexual Organization of the City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rothenberg R, Potterat J. Temporal and social aspects of gonorrhea transmission: the force of infectivity. Sex Transm Dis. 1987;15:88–92.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laumann E, Youm Y. Racial/ethnic differences in the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States: a network explanation. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26:250–261.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blower S, McLean A. Mixing ecology and epidemiology. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1991;245:187–192.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Morris M, Zavisca J, Dean L. Social and sexual networks: their role in the spread of HIV/AIDS among young gay men. AIDS Educ Prev. 1995;7:24–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mansergh G, Marks G. Age and risk of HIV infection in men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1998;12:1119–1128.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. DiClemente R, Wingood G, Crosby R, et al. Sexual risk behaviors associated with having older sex partners: a study of black adolescent females. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29:20–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kral A, Lorvick J, Edlin B. Sex-and drug-related risk among populations of younger and older injection drug users in adjacent neighborhoods in San Francisco. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000;24:162–167.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wood R, Krueger L, Pearlman T, Goldbaum G. HIV Transmission: women’s risk from bisexual men. Am J Public Health. 1993;83:1757–1759.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Doll L, Beeker C. Male bisexual behavior and HIV risk in the United States: synthesis of research with implications for behavioral interventions. AIDS Educ Prev. 1996;8:205–225.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wold C, Seage G, Lenderking W, et al. Unsafe sex in men who have sex with both men and women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998;17:361–367.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Craib K, Weber A, Cornelisse P, et al. Comparison of sexual behaviors, unprotected sex, and substance use between two independent cohorts of gay and bisexual men. AIDS. 2000;14:303–311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tabet S, Sanchez J, Lama J, et al. HIV, syphilis and heterosexual bridging among Peruvian men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2002;16:1271–1277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kerani R, Golden M, Whittington W, Handsfield H, Hogben M, Holmes K. Spatial bridges for the importation of gonorrhea and chlamydial infection. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30:742–749.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams M, Zhao Z, Bowen A, Freeman R, Elwood W, Rusek R. Introduction of HIV into drug injector networks outside AIDS epicenters. Int J STD AIDS. 1997;8:629–635.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Klovdahl A. Social networks and the spread of infectious diseases: the AIDS example. Soc Sci Med. 1985;21:1203–1216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wallace R. Traveling waves of HIV infection on a low dimensional ‘socio-geographic’ network. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32:847–852.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bloor M. The Sociology of HIV Transmission. London: Sage Publications; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ososanya O, Brieger W. Rural-urban mobility in south-western Nigeria: implications for HIV/AIDS transmission from urban to rural communities. Health Educ Res. 1994;9:507–518.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Singh Y, Malavlya A. Long distance truck drivers in India: HIV infection and their possible role in disseminating HIV into rural areas. Int J STD AIDS. 1994;5:137–138.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wyle J, Jolly A. Patterns of chlamydia and gonorrhea infection in sexual networks in Manitoba, Canada. Sex Transm Dis. 2000;28:14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aral S, Hughes J, Stoner B, et al. Sexual mixing patterns in the spread of gonococcal and chlamydial infections. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:825–833.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cook R, Royce R, Thomas J, Hanusa B. What’s driving an epidemic? The spread of syphilis along an interstate highway in rural North Carolina. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:369–373.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Williams M, Bowen A, Timpson S, Keel K. Drug injection and sexual mixing patterns of drug using male sex workers. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30:571–574.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Elifson K, Boles J, Sweat M. Risk factors associated with HIV infection among male prostitutes. Am J Public Health. 1993;83:79–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Parker M, Ward H, Day S. Sexual networks and the transmssion of HIV in London. J Biosocial Sci. 1998;30:63–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Morse E, Simon P, Osofsky H, Balson P, Gaumer H. The male street prostitute: a vector for trasmission of HIV infection into the heterosexual world. Soc Sci Med. 1991;5:535–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Williams M, Timpson S, Klovdahl A, Bowen A, Ross M, Keel K. HIV risk among a sample of male sex workers. AIDS. 2003;17:1402–1404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Williams M, Ross M, Bowen A, et al. An investigation of condom use by frequency of sex. Sex Transm Infect. 2001;77:433–435.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bowen A, Williams M, McCoy H, McCoy C. An investigation of the psychosocial determinants of condom use among sexually active heterosexual drug users. AIDS Care. 2001;13:579–594.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark L. Williams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, M.L., Atkinson, J., Klovdahl, A. et al. Spatial bridging in a network of drug-using male sex workers. J Urban Health 82 (Suppl 1), i35–i42 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jti022

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jti022

Keywords

Navigation