Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Research letter
Screening for asymptomatic STIs in HIV-infected men who have sex with men
Free
  1. Rein Willekens1,2,
  2. Irene Sánchez1,
  3. Lucía Miguel1,
  4. Juliana Esperalba3,
  5. Judit Serra-Pladevall3,
  6. Mario Martin1,
  7. Jordi Navarro1,4,
  8. Vicenç Falcó1,2,
  9. Joaquín Burgos1,
  10. Esteban Ribera1,
  11. Estrella Caballero3,
  12. Adrian Curran1
  1. 1 Department of Infectious Diseases, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
  2. 2 Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  3. 3 Microbiology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
  4. 4 Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
  1. Correspondence to Dr Rein Willekens, Department of Infectious Diseases, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona 08035, Spain; reinmorales{at}gmail.com

Abstract

We aimed to study the prevalence, characteristics and risk factors of asymptomatic sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM). We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study, including asymptomatic HIV-infected MSM attending regular visits between December 2014 and December 2017. Of the 301 patients included, 60 patients (19.9%) presented at least one STI. The most common STI was syphilis (33 of 69 STIs), followed by chlamydia (19 of 69), gonorrhoea (10 of 69), hepatitis C virus (4 of 69) and lymphogranuloma venereum (3 of 69). Illicit drug use during sex was the only variable significantly associated with the presence of an STI on multivariate analysis (OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.17–3.89). We were unable to identify a subgroup of patients where we could potentially avoid STI screening. Our findings support current guidelines that recommend routine screening for all HIV-infected MSM regardless of their self-reported sexual history.

  • clinical STI care
  • screening
  • HIV
  • men
  • cost-effectiveness

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

International guidelines recommend at least annual screening for syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia in all sexually active HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM).1–3 Lack of symptoms is common with an observed STIs point prevalence in asymptomatic HIV-infected MSM of 13%–16% in previous studies.4–9 While testing for STIs has increased in recent years, it remains far below guidelines’ recommendations.10–12 We aimed to study the prevalence, characteristics and risk factors of asymptomatic STIs in HIV-infected MSM.

We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study in a Spanish university hospital, including asymptomatic HIV-infected MSM (aged ≥17 years) attending regular visits at the outpatient HIV clinic between December 2014 and December 2017. We excluded patients with STI symptoms and those treated with antibiotics in the last 30 days. All patients completed a self-administered questionnaire that included information about sexual behaviour, condom use and recreational drugs. We screened for gonorrhoea and chlamydia by multiplex real-time PCR tests in pharynx, rectum and first-void urine. We performed serologies for syphilis, hepatitis C virus and hepatitis B virus. We performed a PCR test for hepatitis C virus following clinicians’ criteria.

We assessed comparisons between groups by the Mann-Whitney U test for quantitative variables and χ2 test based analyses for qualitative variables. We used logistic regression to estimate the ORs and associated 95% CI for potential risk factors associated with the presence of any STI. To evaluate if we could potentially avoid STI screening in a subgroup of patients through a risk-based screening strategy, we developed a decision tree algorithm. We performed a sensitivity analysis using a cost-matrix for misclassification to consider the cost of misclassifying patients with an STI as uninfected using this decision tree.

During the study period, we included 301 patients. Four patients (1.3%) were screened incompletely but were included for final analysis. In total, 60 patients (19.9%) presented at least one of the screened STIs, diagnosing 69 STIs (table 1). Although 215 of 300 patients (71.7%) reported previous STIs, only 77 of 278 patients (27.7%) reported previous STI testing. Of the 96 patients who reported being in a monogamous relationship, 15 patients (15.6%) tested positive for any STI. Of the 29 patients who reported always using a condom for oral and anal sex, three patients (10.3%) had an STI. After adjustment for potential confounders on multivariate analysis, only illicit drug use during sex remained significantly associated with the presence of an STI (OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.17 to 3.89). We were unable to develop a valid decision tree to identify patients that could avoid screening because our algorithm showed no stable solution for any cost-matrix value and too many patients with STIs would go undiagnosed. See online supplementary file 1 for detailed information about the baseline characteristics of our study cohort and the analysis of potential risk factors associated with STIs.

Supplemental material

Table 1

STIs detected in asymptomatic HIV-infected men who have sex with men

Our findings support current guidelines that recommend routine screening for all HIV-infected MSM regardless of their self-reported sexual history. Future public health strategies should consider the economic costs and cost-effectiveness associated with regular screening for STIs in all HIV-infected MSM.

References

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Anna Maria Geretti

  • Contributors RW was responsible for study design, literature search, data collection, analysis, interpretation and manuscript writing. IS was responsible for study conception and design, data collection and interpretation, and manuscript review. LM, JE, JS-P, JN, VF, JB, ER and EC were responsible for data collection and interpretation, and manuscript review. MM was responsible for data analysis and manuscript review. AC was responsible for study conception and design, data collection, analysis, interpretation and manuscript review.

  • Funding This work has been partially supported by the SPANISH AIDS Research Network RD16/0025/0007 project as part of the Plan Nacional R+D+I and by ISCIII-Subdirección General de Evaluación y el Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional.

  • Disclaimer The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval The local ethics committee approved the study protocol (number: PR(AG)238/2014), and we obtained written informed consent from all patients.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.