Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Economic advantages of ligase chain reaction for diagnosis of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in GUM clinic attenders
  1. Ambreen Butt1,
  2. Robert McCartney2,
  3. Andrew Walker3,
  4. Anne Scoular4
  1. 1Department of Genitourinary Medicine and Sexual Health, Sandyford Initiative, 6 Sandyford Place, Glasgow G3 7NB, UK
  2. 2West of Scotland Regional Virus Laboratory, Gartnavel General Hospital, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0YN
  3. 3Greater Glasgow Health Board, Glasgow
  4. 4Department of Genitourinary Medicine and Sexual Health, Sandyford Initiative, 6 Sandyford Place, Glasgow
  1. Dr Buttambreenmorrison{at}yahoo.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Editor,—Genital infection with Chlamydia trachomatis is highly prevalent and recognised as a major threat to public health.

There is now a wealth of evidence to demonstrate the superiority of DNA amplification techniques over antigen detection and culture.1 Only one large study has directly compared ligase chain reaction (LCR) with enzyme immunoassay (EIA) on identical clinical material2 and no studies have analysed the health economic impact of LCR in a genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinic population.

We studied the diagnostic effectiveness and cost of LCR compared with EIA.

All GUM attendees undergoing sexual health screening were offered the opportunity to participate. Men presenting with dysuria or urethral discharge were defined as symptomatic. Swabs were collected in …

View Full Text