Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
A recent article published in Sexually Transmitted Infections1 presented evidence suggesting that the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Ukraine had peaked in 1997 and has since declined. The world has only recently awoken to the threat of a widespread HIV/AIDS epidemic in eastern Europe, including projections of an epidemic in Russia of between 6–11% by 2010, and the potential for economic decline and geopolitical instability.2 HIV trends in Ukraine, with many of the same socioeconomic characteristics and risk factors found in Russia—namely, large numbers of injecting drug users (IDUs), an expanding sex industry, internal and external migration, poor access to health care, general economic and social upheaval, and a recent explosive syphilis epidemic—must therefore be examined closely. Could Ukraine present a model for Russia in terms of controlling the HIV epidemic, or does Ukraine in fact represent an ongoing epidemic inadequately described by official statistics?
The first indication that perhaps the data presented by Mavrov and Bondarenko1 may not accurately reflect the ongoing HIV epidemic in Ukraine is the apparent contradiction in table 1, which reports the prevalence of HIV among select groups in 1998 and 1999. While HIV prevalence for “all populations” declined, every subpopulation increased, except for a decline from 0.07% to 0.064% among blood donors. Prevalence among pregnant women, who reflect the likely future of the epidemic, increased by 33%.
Current official statistics in Ukraine simply do not reflect the current status of the epidemic, and, importantly, do not reflect the likely future course of the epidemic. As Mavrov and Bondarenko report, the majority of new HIV cases continue to be among IDUs. This population is wary of the healthcare sector, as the acknowledgement of drug use to a healthcare provider leads to obligatory registration and confinement for treatment, possible job loss, loss of one’s driving licence, and criminal prosecution. Kobyshcha3 reported that only 5% of IDUs were covered by the current system of HIV surveillance. Rather than the 8.6% prevalence reported by Mavrov and Bondarenko among IDUs, cross sectional studies have shown prevalence of between 18% and 64% (table 1).
Behavioural factors also argue against the likelihood of a stable epidemic in Ukraine. In a study of female sex workers (FSWs) in Odessa conducted in 1997 and 1999, the percentage of FSWs reporting always using condoms declined (from 49% to 40%).4 A 1999 national reproductive health survey found that 27% of women reported condom use at the time of first sexual experience.5
A recent attempt to model the future course of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Ukraine, developed an “optimistic” scenario, where HIV prevalence increased to 2% of the adult population by 2010, and a “pessimistic” scenario, where HIV prevalence increased to 5%.6 While official statistics might indicate a stable epidemic, after more than two decades of global experience, no one should mistake the clear evidence that an explosive epidemic is ongoing in the Ukraine. Failing to acknowledge the true nature of an epidemic has yet to save any nation from its consequences.