Download PDFPDF

Comparison of culture and different PCR assays for detection of Trichomonas vaginalis in self collected vaginal swab specimens
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Author's reply
    • Tania Crucitti, Scientific collaborator
    • Other Contributors:
      • Eddy Van Dyck

    Dear Editor

    The purpose of our study was to evaluate five different primer sets described in the literature for the amplification of Trichomonas vaginalis. We therefore used the same working conditions for the five primers sets, i.e. the same extraction method, thermocycler, reagents etc. It was not our aim to re-validate these primer sets.

    For all of the five primer sets we used the AmpliTaq Gold poly...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Taq Polymerase vs. Ampli Taq Gold Polymerase for Trichomonas vaginalis PCR detection.
    • Robert H. Gilman, Proffessor, Director of the Tropical Medicine Institute
    • Other Contributors:
      • Holger Mayta, Maritza Calderon

    Dear Editor

    The article by Crucitti et al.[1] evaluated five PCR techniques for Trichomonas vaginalis including the one published by our group (Mayta et al. [2]). The authors however did not follow the protocol we published and so got results that we consider to be erroneous.

    In our work we used simple Taq polymerase while Crucitti used Taq gold for this purpose. He did this without chang...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.