Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Surveillance of sexually transmitted infections in primary care
  1. W Slater,
  2. N Low
  1. Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Nicola Low
 Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK;

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Surveillance for sexually transmitted infections must respond to increases in the provision of sexual health services outside genitourinary clinics. Simms et al1 propose repeated panel surveys in general practices to improve surveillance in primary care, monitor changes in prevalence over time, and address the current lack of behavioural data.

There are some limitations to this approach. Firstly, prevalence surveys will not measure actual diagnostic activity in primary care and other clinical settings. This is essential for determining whether proposals from the National Strategy for Sexual Health2 are being implemented effectively. Secondly, periodic surveys in different areas could not readily identify outbreaks. In the Bristol area, for example, most cases in an ongoing outbreak of sexually transmitted hepatitis B infection have presented to general practitioners.3 Although genitourinary medicine clinics are the main setting for detecting outbreaks their impact in primary care should be monitored. Thirdly, the validity of panel surveys will depend on a high response rate and postal invitations often have low uptake.4

A single system cannot fulfil all the requirements for infectious disease surveillance. Laboratory reporting remains incomplete5 and denominator data need to be available for infections other than chlamydia for appropriate interpretation of time trends. Routine collection of data on laboratory diagnosed sexually transmitted infections from all clinical settings and linkage to demographic data could complement current proposals.

The Avon Surveillance System for Sexually Transmitted Infections (ASSIST) integrates person based genitourinary clinic and laboratory data to provide information for action at local level and to inform national initiatives.6 Data on positive and negative tests for laboratory diagnosed infections taken in any clinical setting are collected from the Health Protection Agency and trust laboratories. Postcode information for geographical mapping and small area analysis is obtained by matching pseudoanonymised data with GP registration databases. These data are also matched to disaggregate data from genitourinary and Brook clinics to identify duplicate tests and obtain geographic data for infections diagnosed in these settings.

ASSIST project data can be used to estimate the population burden of diagnosed infections and explore associations with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics over time. Automating regular data downloads and reporting will improve the timeliness of data collection to facilitate identification and monitoring of outbreaks. The wide coverage of the system can guide local service development and clinical practice and monitor the impact of the Sexual Health Strategy. For example, in 2001 half of all chlamydia tests and 44% of positive results came from GP, family planning, or Brook clinics. Nearly two thirds (62%) of those tested in general practice were over 25 years old in whom the positivity rate was 4% compared with 11% for under 25 year olds.

We propose that, while behavioural data obtained from panel surveys in primary care provide depth, sentinel surveillance of laboratory diagnosed infections in all clinical settings provides breadth, and both are needed for effective surveillance.