Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Diagnosis of genital chlamydia in primary care: an explanation of reasons for variation in chlamydia testing
  1. C A M McNulty1,
  2. E Freeman2,
  3. J Bowen3,
  4. J Shefras4,
  5. K A Fenton5
  1. 1Primary Care Unit, Microbiology Department, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK
  2. 2Gloucestershire Research and Development Support Unit, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK
  3. 3Health Protection Agency, Primary Care Unit, Microbiology Department, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK
  4. 4Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK
  5. 5Health Protection Agency Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 C A M McNulty
 Primary Care Unit, Microbiology Department, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK; jill.whitinghpa.org.uk

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the reasons for the 40-fold variation in diagnostic testing for genital Chlamydia trachomatis by general practices.

Methods: A qualitative study with focus groups. We randomly selected urban and rural high and low testing practices served by Bristol, Hereford, and Gloucester microbiology laboratories. Open questions were asked about the investigation of C trachomatis in men and women in different clinical contexts.

Results: The high and low testing practices did not differ in their age/sex make-up or by deprivation indices. There were major differences between high and low chlamydia testing practices. Low testing practices knew very little about the epidemiology and presentation of genital chlamydia infection and did not consider it in their differential diagnosis of genitourinary symptoms until patients had consulted several times. Low testers were less aware that chlamydia was usually asymptomatic, thought it was an inner city problem, and had poor knowledge of how to take diagnostic specimens. High testing practices either had a general practitioner with an interest in sexual health or a practice nurse who had completed specialist training in family planning. High testing practices were more cognizant of the symptoms and signs of chlamydia and always considered it in their differential diagnosis of genitourinary symptoms, including patients attending family planning clinics.

Conclusions: Any programme to increase chlamydia testing in primary care must be accompanied by an education and awareness programme especially targeted at low testing practices. This will need to include information about the benefits of testing and who, when, and how to test.

  • Chlamydia trachomatis
  • diagnosis
  • screening

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

Linked Articles

  • Brief Encounters
    Helen Ward Rob Miller