Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

Download PDFPDF
A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection
  1. H M Götz1,
  2. J E A M van Bergen2,
  3. I K Veldhuijzen1,
  4. J Broer3,
  5. C J P A Hoebe4,
  6. J H Richardus1,5
  1. 1Municipal Public Health Service Rotterdam, the Netherlands
  2. 2STI AIDS (SOA AIDS Nederland) Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  3. 3Municipal Public Health Service Groningen, the Netherlands
  4. 4Municipal Public Health Service Eastern South Limburg, the Netherlands
  5. 5Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
  6. 6Municipal Public Health Service ‘Hart voor Brabant’, the Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to:
 Ms H M Götz
 Municipal Health Service Rotterdam, Department Infectious Diseases, PO Box 70032, 3000 LP Rotterdam, the Netherlands; gotzhggd.rotterdam.nl

Abstract

Background: Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infections is aimed at the reduction of these infections and subsequent complications. Selective screening may increase the cost effectiveness of a screening programme. Few population based systematic screening programmes have been carried out and attempts to validate selective screening criteria have shown poor performance. This study describes the development of a prediction rule for estimating the risk of chlamydial infection as a basis for selective screening.

Methods: A population based chlamydia screening study was performed in the Netherlands by inviting 21 000 15–29 year old women and men in urban and rural areas for home based urine testing. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for chlamydial infection among 6303 sexually active participants, and the discriminative ability was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Internal validity was assessed with bootstrap resampling techniques.

Results: The prevalence of C trachomatis (CT) infection was 2.6% (95% CI 2.2 to 3.2) in women and 2.0% (95% CI 1.4 to 2.7) in men. Chlamydial infection was associated with high level of urbanisation, young age, Surinam/Antillian ethnicity, low/intermediate education, multiple lifetime partners, a new contact in the previous two months, no condom use at last sexual contact, and complaints of (post)coital bleeding in women and frequent urination in men. A prediction model with these risk factors showed adequate discriminative ability at internal validation (AUC 0.78).

Conclusion: The prediction rule has the potential to guide individuals in their choice of participation when offered chlamydia screening and is a promising tool for selective CT screening at population level.

  • AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
  • AAD, area address density
  • MHS, Municipal Public Health Service
  • PID, pelvic inflammatory disease
  • chlamydia trachomatis
  • mass screening
  • risk factors
  • Netherlands
  • prediction rule

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • The PILOT CT study group are: JEAM van Bergen, J Broer, AJJ Coenen, HM Götz, F de Groot, CJPA Hoebe, JH Richardus, DT van Schaik, EW Steyerberg, IK Veldhuijzen, MJC Verhooren.

    This research has been financed by a grant from Zorg Onderzoek Nederland, which has no commercial interests and had no role in study design, organisation of the study, and/or writing of the report.

  • Conflict of interest: none declared

Linked Articles