Article Text

This article has a Reply. Please see:

Download PDFPDF
Condom effectiveness for prevention of C trachomatis infection
  1. L Warner1,2,
  2. M Macaluso1,
  3. D Newman1,
  4. H Austin2,
  5. D Kleinbaum2,
  6. M Kamb3,
  7. J Douglas3,
  8. C K Malotte4,
  9. J M Zenilman5
  1. 1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Reproductive Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
  2. 2Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University, Department of Epidemiology, Atlanta, GA, USA
  3. 3Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of STD Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
  4. 4California State University – Long Beach Department of Health Science, Long Beach, CA, USA
  5. 5Baltimore City Health Department, and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Division, Baltimore, MD, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 Lee Warner
 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Reproductive Health, 4770 Bulford Highway NE, Mail Stop K-34, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA; dlw7{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Replicating methods and comparing results across studies are critical for the resolution of scientific controversies. In a recent report, Niccolai et al demonstrated that condoms were effective in preventing chlamydia among STD clinic patients with known exposure to Chlamydia trachomatis.1 We were pleased to see the authors apply the methodology that we first presented for estimating condom effectiveness against chlamydia and gonorrhoea in 20012,3 and published in the American Journal of Epidemiology last year.4 Their findings confirm the importance of restricting the study population to people with known STI exposure (that is, sexual contacts of infected people) to reduce confounding on condom effectiveness estimates …

View Full Text


  • Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this letter are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Linked Articles

  • Brief Encounters
    Helen Ward Rob Miller