Article Text

Download PDFPDF
“It feels good to be told that I’m all clear”: patients’ accounts of retesting following genital chlamydial infection
  1. H Piercy
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Hilary Piercy
 School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Winter Street, Sheffield S3 7ND, UK; h.piercy{at}


Objective: To examine the meaning that people with genital chlamydial infection attribute to retesting as part of their treatment management.

Methods: Unstructured interviews with 50 heterosexual patients (40 female and 10 male) who had or had had genital chlamydia infection. Recruitment was via a genitourinary medicine clinic and a contraceptive clinic.

Results: The return visit was understood in terms of the retest. The retest occupied a pivotal position in the infection experience and was invested with symbolic significance because it provided a means by which to deal with feelings of bodily pollution. It marked the end of dirtiness that was important for the restoration of identity. It also marked the beginning of cleanness that was important in relation to sexual relationships.

Conclusion: The sociocultural construction of sexually transmitted infections shapes the individual experience of having chlamydial infection. This perspective sheds light on the meaning that individuals invest in aspects of infection management. It is important for some people to know rather than assume that their infection has been eliminated, a function that is fulfilled by the retest. When retesting is not available, individuals may use increasingly available opportunistic chlamydia testing for this purpose with consequent cost and resource implications.

  • FP, family planning
  • GUM, genitourinary medicine
  • TOC, test of cure
  • chlamydia trachomatis
  • retesting
  • qualitative research

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • The author is the sole contributor to this paper.

  • Conflict of interest: none.

  • Ethical approval: this study received ethical approval from the North Derbyshire local research ethics committee.