Objectives: To assess whether individual clinic-based counselling as a supplement to peer education for male and female condom promotion leads to greater use of protection and lower STI prevalence among sex workers in Madagascar already exposed to intensive male condom promotion.
Methods: In two public dispensaries in Madagascar, a total of 901 sex workers were randomly allocated between two alternative male and female condom promotion interventions: peer education only, or peer education supplemented with individual clinic-based counselling. Participants were followed for 12 months. Every 2 months they made clinic visits, where they were interviewed on condom use. Peer educators counselled all participants on condom use as they accompanied their assigned participants to study visits. Participants assigned to receive the supplemental intervention were counselled by a trained clinician following study interviews. Participants were tested and treated for chlamydia, gonorrhoea and trichomoniasis every 6 months. We used logistic regression to assess whether the more intensive intervention was associated with reduced STI prevalence. Use of protection with clients and non-paying partners was assessed by study arm, site, and visit.
Results: There was no statistically significant association between study arm and aggregated STI prevalence. No substantial differences in levels of reported protection were noted between study groups.
Conclusions: This study found little evidence for gains from more thorough clinical counselling on male and female condom use. These findings suggest that less clinically intensive interventions such as peer education could be suitable for male and female condom promotion in populations already exposed to barrier method promotion.
- STI, sexually transmitted infection
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
THH and PJF participated in the conceptualisation and design of the study, the analysis and interpretation of data, and the drafting and revising of the article. KVD participated in the conceptualisation and design of the study, the acquisition of data, and the drafting and revising of the article. MDN and TWG participated in the analysis and interpretation of data, and the drafting and revising of the article. ELW participated in the design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, and the drafting and revising of the article. LoR and LeR participated in the acquisition of data, and the drafting and revising of the article. AR participated in the conceptualisation of the study, and the drafting and revising of the article. This study is registered on http://www.clinicaltrials.gov with identifier NCT00272974.
Funding: Partial support for this work was provided by Family Health International (FHI) with funds from the US Agency for International Development (USAID).
Competing interests: None declared.