Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Who attends primary care services prior to attendance at genitourinary services and what level of care have they received?
  1. R Neale,
  2. F Keane,
  3. N Saulsbury,
  4. L Haddon,
  5. R Osborne
  1. Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
  1. Dr R Neale, Department of GU medicine, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, TR1 3LJ, UK; rachn2000{at}


Objective: To determine the proportion of patients initially attending primary care services and describe the care received prior to attending genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics.

Method: A cross-sectional survey of 1000 new patients attending GUM services in Cornwall between June and December 2006. Patients were asked during consultation whether they had attended primary care before coming and what examination, investigation and management had been carried out there.

Results: 35% (348/1000) of patients had attended primary care initially. Genital examination had been carried out in primary care on 60% (111/185) female and 58% (93/159) male patients (p = 0.78). Chlamydia testing had been carried out in 27% (46/171) female and 6% (8/139) male patients (p<0.005). 33% (100/301) patients seen in primary care had been offered treatment. 74% (68/92) patients with genital warts had been correctly diagnosed in primary care and 9% (8/92) of these offered treatment.

Conclusions: The majority of these patients, including those given a diagnosis and/or offered treatment in primary care, had not had a chlamydia test or any other investigations. With the potential “fall out” of patients between primary care and GUM services, this may represent a missed opportunity to detect and appropriately manage sexually transmitted infections.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Contributors: RN was involved in data collection, analysis and writing the manuscript. FK was involved in study design, data collection and editing the manuscript. RO was involved in data collection and database construction. LH and NS were involved in data collection.

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval was obtained.

Linked Articles

  • Brief encounters
    Helen Ward Rob Miller