Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Do all patients wanting a sexually transmitted infection screen need to be seen within 48 hours?
  1. Gary Brook
  1. Gary Brook, Clinical Lead in GUM/HIV Services, North West London Hospitals Trust, Patrick Clements GUM Centre, Central Middlesex Hospital, Acton Lane, London NW10 7NS; gary.brook{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Describing his relationship with society, Oscar Wilde said: “The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about”. This quote could be applied to the way sexual health professionals in the UK feel about the Department of Health (DH). After years of neglect, sexual health was “talked about” so much in the DH corridors of power that it became one of six national health priorities. As a result, much-needed money was invested in the specialty.1 But with this extra investment came the dreaded outcome targets. Of course targets can be useful, but there are many examples within the NHS over the years of unintended consequences and perverse incentives being engendered by targets that were seemingly inadequately thought through.

One of the DH sexual health targets is that all patients wanting a sexually transmitted infection (STI) screen should be offered an appointment within 48 h.1 A more recent subsidiary aim is that 95% of patients should actually be seen within this time frame.2 This makes sense epidemiologically speaking, in that the longer a patient has to wait the more the likelihood that there will be undesirable consequences such as onward …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests: None.

  • This article was written solely by the author. Thanks go to Drs J McSorley and S Murphy who made helpful comments during the writing of the editorial.

Linked Articles