Responses

Download PDFPDF
Missing pelvic inflammatory disease? Substantial differences in the rate at which doctors diagnose PID
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Missing PID: Is it a reflection of training?

    Dear Editor,

    This report confirms that PID can be often be missed clinically. Other than lowering the threshold for diagnosis, there could be other ways of improving diagnosis of PID. Training background may have contributed to the different rate of diagnosis among doctors. It would be important to review whether high diagnosing doctors were more likely to have had gynaecology training compared with low diagnosing d...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.