Responses

Download PDFPDF
Prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in young women in South London
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Not false positive tests- Just different populations

    Dear Editor

    In their letter Aghaizu et al suggest that the differences in the prevalence in their study 1 and our study 2may be attributable to false positive tests using strand displacement assay (ProbeTec, Becton Dickenson). We disagree with these observations. We would like to point out that the populations studied were substantially different- majority of our subjects attended sexual health and reproduction clinics...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.