Article Text
Abstract
Objective To understand the influence of voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) and an HIV-negative result on subsequent sexual behaviour; and to identify the specific felt needs of those testing negative.
Design Serial interviews, 6 months apart, with people who had tested negative, and three one-off focus group discussions with counsellors. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Paired transcripts were analysed longitudinally.
Participants Purposively sampled from first attenders for VCT who had tested negative.
Setting Four health-facility affiliated VCT centres in two mining towns in the Copperbelt Province of Zambia.
Results Participants in the 42 initial and 31 follow-up interviews understood VCT as ‘testing for HIV’. Most participants reported having adopted safer sexual behaviour months before attending VCT. They had already recognised personal susceptibility to HIV infection and reported engaging both emotionally and cognitively with the issues of testing. Ultimately attendance at testing was to know their status in order to regain control of their lives. Unmet post-test support needs were common and included additional information, supportive networks, life-skills training and access to recreational activities.
Conclusions In this population who tested HIV negative the majority said they had made life changes months before attending VCT. Counselling served to consolidate pre-test decisions about risk behaviour. Those testing HIV negative are underserved compared with those testing positive. We recommend that counselling for HIV should be de-linked from testing to encourage earlier attendance for counselling and that clients testing negative should receive more post-test support to help them remain HIV negative.
- Africa
- developing world
- health belief model
- HIV testing
- service development
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding British Commonwealth, Scholarships and Fellowships Plan.
Competing interests None.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the University of Edinburgh and the University of Zambia.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.