You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 89, Issue 1
  • Re-screening Chlamydia trachomatis positive subjects: a comparison of practices between an STI clinic, general practitioners and gynaecologists

Article info

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Epidemiology
Short report
Re-screening Chlamydia trachomatis positive subjects: a comparison of practices between an STI clinic, general practitioners and gynaecologists

Authors

  • Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers Department of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases and Environment, Public Health Service South Limburg, Geleen, South Limburg, The NetherlandsDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, South Limburg, The Netherlands PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Genevieve A F S van Liere Department of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases and Environment, Public Health Service South Limburg, Geleen, South Limburg, The NetherlandsDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, South Limburg, The Netherlands PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Christian J P A Hoebe Department of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases and Environment, Public Health Service South Limburg, Geleen, South Limburg, The NetherlandsDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, South Limburg, The Netherlands PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Dr Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers, Department of Infectious Diseases, South Limburg Public Health Service, P.O. Box 2022, 6160 HA Geleen, South Limburg, The Netherlands; nicole.dukers{at}ggdzl.nl
View Full Text

Citation

Dukers-Muijrers NHTM, van Liere GAFS, Hoebe CJPA
Re-screening Chlamydia trachomatis positive subjects: a comparison of practices between an STI clinic, general practitioners and gynaecologists
Sexually Transmitted Infections 2013;89:25-27.

Publication history

  • Accepted July 19, 2012
  • First published September 1, 2012.
Online issue publication 
May 14, 2021

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions