Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Postgraduate training in genitourinary medicine, HIV in-patient care and the future role of the speciality
  1. Rak Nandwani
  1. Correspondence to Dr Rak Nandwani, Sandyford, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, 6 Sandyford Place, Glasgow G3 7NB, UK; rak.nandwani{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

How will doctors provide care for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the UK in future? Will they be hospital-based general physicians with a special interest in STIs participating in medical receiving or will they be in community settings overseeing multidisciplinary delivery of integrated sexual health? And what of HIV in-patient care? Will Genitourinary medicine (GUM) specialists continue to maintain responsibility for unwell patients? Or will GUM have disappeared having been absorbed into European Dermato-Venereology or dismantled by non-National Health Service care providers?

So far, GUM has an excellent record of keeping abreast with service redesign and external policy drivers. Postgraduate training is a key component of the specialty’s ability to do so. A major update of the GUM specialty training curriculum was published in 2010.1 This incorporated significant expansion of competencies in HIV medicine, reproductive health, public health and management/leadership.2 The GUM curriculum mirrors the current role of the specialty by ensuring that doctors gain all competencies required by existing health services. The …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests RN is Chair of the Genitourinary Medicine Specialty Advisory Committee of the Joint Royal Colleges Postgraduate Training Board (JRCPTB) and a BASHH Board Member/Trustee. The views are expressed are his own and not necessarily those of JRCPTB or BASHH.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.