Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P3.385 Comparative Experience and Outcomes of Clinic Staff Versus Intensive Researcher Led Recruitment to a Sexual Health Intervention in UK Primary Care
  1. J A Cassell1,
  2. J Dodds2,
  3. S Lanza1,
  4. N Low3,
  5. T Roberts4,
  6. H E Smith1,
  7. G Rait5
  1. 1Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
  2. 2Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK
  3. 3University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  4. 4University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  5. 5University College London, London, UK


Background As part of a national randomised controlled trial, we attempted to recruit young people for Chlamydia testing and partner notification interventions in UK general practises (primary care clinics). Practices were paid for recruitment which was managed by clinic staff. Despite training, there were barriers to testing and recruitment: staff experienced competing priorities, were reluctant to mention testing, perceived that STIs were uncommon in their population, and believed that few young people attended the clinic. We aimed to assess the effect of intensive researcher led recruitment on testing rates and compare with prior optimised recruitment by clinic staff.

Methods Ten general practises in North and South East England agreed to participate. We trained research staff on recruitment processes and allocated a researcher to each general practise. The researcher approached potentially eligible young people in the waiting room for a three week period and offered Chlamydia testing and trial enrolment. We compared testing and recruitment rates with those achieved by clinic staff over a period of 3 months.

Results 1145 16–25 year olds were approached in the 10 practises during intensive recruitment periods, of whom 43% consented and tested. Of refusals, 37% had tested elsewhere. Most practises achieved 45–50 tests per 3 week period, compared with 3–4 per month during 3 months of optimised clinic staff recruitment.

Conclusion External researcher led intensive recruitment increased testing levels substantially and should be considered as an alternative to clinic staff enrolment in primary care. Even if enrolment targets are met, the impact of sexual health interventions in primary care will be limited unless barriers to engagement in sexual health are overcome.

  • chlamydia
  • Partner Notification
  • Primary care

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.