Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P3.396 Are the World AIDS Conferences Guilty of Gender Bias? Evidence from Trends in the Monitoring of WAC Scientific Discourse from 1989 to 2012
  1. B E Spencer1,
  2. A Jeannin2,
  3. F Dubois-Arber2,
  4. P Iriarte3
  1. 1Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
  2. 2Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
  3. 3Public Health Documentation Centre (CDSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland


Background The issue of gender is acknowledged as a key issue for the AIDS epidemic. World AIDS Conferences (WAC) have constituted a major discursive space for the epidemic. We sought to establish the balance regarding gender in the AIDS scientific discourse by following its development in the published proceedings of WAC. Fifteen successive WAC 1989–2012 served to establish a “barometer” of scientific interest in heterosexual and homo/bisexual men and women throughout the epidemic. It was hypothesised that, as in other domains of Sexual and Reproductive Health, heterosexual men would be “forgotten” partners.

Method Abstracts from each conference were entered in electronic form into an Access database. Queries were created to generate five categories of interest and to monitor their annual frequency. All abstract titles including the term “men” or “women” were identified. Collections of synonyms were systematically and iteratively developed in order to classify further abstracts according to whether they included terms referring to “homo/bisexual” or “heterosexual”. Reference to “Mother to Child Transmission” (MTCT) was also flagged.

Results The category including “men”, but without additional reference to “homo-bisexuel” (i.e. referring to men in general and/or to heterosexual men) consistently appears four times less often than the equivalent category for women. Excluding abstracts on women and MTCT has little impact on this difference. Abstracts including reference to both “men” and “homo-bisexual” emerge as the second-most frequent category; presence of the equivalent category for women is minimal.

Conclusion The hypothesised absence of heterosexual men in the AIDS discourse was confirmed. Although the relative presence of homo-bisexual men and women as a focal subject may be explained by epidemiological data, this is not so in the case of heterosexual men and women. This imbalance has consequences for HIV prevention.

  • gender
  • HIV
  • men

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.