Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P5.011 Are Australian General Practitioners (GPs) and Practise Nurses (PNs) Equipped For Increased Chlamydia Testing? Findings from the Australian Chlamydia Control Effectiveness Pilot (ACCEPt)
  1. R Lorch1,
  2. A Yeung2,
  3. J S Hocking2,
  4. A Vaisey2,
  5. C K Fairley2,3,
  6. B Donovan1,
  7. M Law1,
  8. M Temple-Smith4,
  9. R Guy1
  1. 1Kirby Institute, University of New South UK, Coogee, Sydney, Australia
  2. 2Centre for Women’s Health, Gender and Society, Melbourne School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
  3. 3Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Carlton, Melbourne, Australia
  4. 4Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia


Background ACCEPt, a large cluster randomised control trial, aims to determine if annual testing for 16 to 29 year olds in general practise can reduce chlamydia prevalence. ACCEPt is also the first trial investigating the potential role of the PN in chlamydia testing. To inform the intervention, GPs’ and PNs’ chlamydia knowledge and practises were explored.

Methods GPs and PNs from 143 clinics were recruited from 54 postcodes in 4 Australian States and asked to complete a survey at time of recruitment. Survey responses were compared using conditional logistic regression to account for GPs and PNs from the same clinics participating.

Results Of 607 GPs and 126 PNs enrolled in ACCEPt, 86% and 78% completed the questionnaire, respectively. A third of GPs (32%) compared to 23% of PNs (P = 0.076) correctly identified the two age groups with the highest infection rates in women and only 17% vs 16% (P = 0.942) identified the correct age groups in men. Fewer GPs than PNs would offer testing opportunistically to asymptomatic young patients, including women having a Pap smear (55% vs. 84%, P = < 0.001); antenatal checkup (44% vs. 83%, P = < 0.001) and Aboriginal men with a sore throat (33% vs. 79%, P = < 0.001). Fewer GPs than PNs knew that retesting was recommended after chlamydia treatment (87% vs. 93%, P = 0.027); and that the recommended timeframe for retesting was 3 months (26% vs 66%, P = < 0.001). Under half of PNs (41%) reported involvement in chlamydia testing, with 79% wanting greater involvement and 87% wanting further training.

Conclusion Our survey reveals more gaps in chlamydia knowledge and management among GPs than PNs, which may be contributing to low testing rates in general practise. PNs have a role in increasing chlamydia testing.

  • ACCEPt
  • chlamydia

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.