Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P203 Curriculum competences-based evaluation of genitourinary medicine higher specialist training in a large teaching hospital
  1. Mitesh Desai,
  2. Anatole Menon-Johansson,
  3. Gulshan Sethi
  1. Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK


Background/introduction Award of a certificate of completion of training is dependent on registrars attaining 44 competences described in the 2010 Genitourinary Medicine Higher Specialty Training curriculum.

Aim(s)/objectives This study evaluates clinical opportunities of a 4-year modular training programme in a large teaching hospital to determine:

  1. Whether opportunity cost of training to service delivery is justifiable.

  2. Competences that are inadequately addressed by direct clinical opportunities alone.

Methods Curriculum competences-based evaluation was undertaken with local faculty and trainees quantitatively assessing the ‘usefulness’ of the modular programme to meet each curriculum competence.

A Quality-Cost Justification matrix determined whether opportunity costs to service provision could be justified for individual clinical opportunities. This considered whether the opportunity is a mandatory curriculum requirement as well as the quality of training determined by triangulating quantitative ‘usefulness’ ratings of the faculty with qualitative findings of the trainee survey.

Results While 100% (n = 6) of registrars were either satisfied or very satisfied with existing clinical opportunities, these were only sufficiently useful for attaining 23/44 competences. Additional formalised training by way of an academic programme, opportunities to design teaching programmes and research and management experience were required to meet 10/20 GUM, 5/18 HIV, 6/6 management competences.

For all sexual health and 2/6 HIV clinical opportunities, the high quality of training justified the opportunity cost to service provision.

Discussion/conclusion The curriculum competences-based approach to training evaluation offers a focused and objective approach to resolve conflict of training and service provision. Furthermore, it highlights and supports formalisation of non-clinical training opportunities.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.