Article Text

P056 Providing written information in the electronic era – is it time for a re-think?
  1. Sophie Brady,
  2. Nicola Fearnley
  1. Bradford Sexual Health, Locala Community Partnerships CIC, Bradford, UK


Introduction Recent BASHH guidelines state that patients should be directed to clear, accurate written or web-based information and this is often an auditable outcome. We stopped providing paper leaflets in 2016 as our electronic patient record (EPR) allows a link to web based patient information leaflet (PIL) to be sent by short message service (SMS). Our aim was to identify if this had improved uptake of written information.

Methods We identified 200 patients who received a positive chlamydia or gonorrhoea result and returned to clinic for treatment. Records were reviewed for offer and uptake of PIL.

Results 41 patients (20.5%) were sent a PIL link, 20 (10%) were documented to have declined and 139 (69.5%) had no documentation regarding PIL.

Discussion Provision of links to PIL was low in this patient group. This compares to our 2012 audit of chlamydia, a time of paper records, where 59% accepted a leaflet. Our EPR shows the link has been sent but requires free text to record offer or refusal, so the actual offer may have been higher and not documented. Half had the name of the infection specified in a results SMS and therefore many may have already sought web based information prior to treatment. Plans to improve our documentation of offer of PIL include consideration of a PIL link with the initial positive SMS. Patients are increasingly likely to access information online, sometimes prior to attendance and BASHH may wish to consider this in their guideline recommendations and auditable outcomes.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.