Article Text

Download PDFPDF

O09.7 Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about hiv pre-exposure prophylaxis among u.s. army health care providers
  1. Eric Garges1,
  2. Jason Blayock2,
  3. Yuanzhang Li3,
  4. Shannon Wood3,
  5. Jason Okulicz4,
  6. Charmagne Beckett5,
  7. Clinton Murray6,
  8. Nelson Michael7,
  9. Paul Scott7,
  10. Shilpa Hakre7
  1. 1Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, USA
  2. 2Infectious Disease Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Centre, USA
  3. 3Preventive Medicine Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, USA
  4. 4Infectious Disease Service, San Antonio Military Medical Centre, USA
  5. 5Navy Bloodborne Infection Management Centre, USA
  6. 6Army Medical Department Centre and School, USA
  7. 7US Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, USA


Introduction Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has become a promising modality in the global fight against HIV. No data is available about the current utilisation, knowledge, or attitudes about PrEP provision in the US Army. Recent analysis of HIV-infected Army personnel indicates men who have sex with men are most at risk. We conducted a survey to characterise the level of PrEP awareness and adoption and examine PrEP-related knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs associated with PrEP adoption.

Methods In October 2016 we initiated an online survey to eligible US Army healthcare providers in the fields of infectious disease, public health, internal medicine, family medicine, and flight medicine. Demographic and clinical practice data was collected as well as questions about PrEP knowledge, attitudes, and program implementation within the Army. Provider knowledge and attitudes were assessed in univariate and bivariate analysis.

Results 754 providers responded, largely from family medicine (58%) and internal medicine (18%) specialties. While a large proportion (31%) had been questioned by patients about PrEP, only 12% reported having prescribed it. Current experience with PrEP was highest (83%) among infectious disease providers. Concerns for widespread use included medication adverse effects (61%), compliance (56%), and a need for “more clear evidence” (54%), among others. While most (91%) endorsed the use of PrEP, and favoured the implementation of PrEP programs for service members at high risk, over half (54%) reported their knowledge of PrEP as ‘poor’. Self-reported PrEP knowledge was associated with prior use of HIV antiretrovirals (p<0.0001). Almost half (43%) of providers surveyed felt that they had patients who would benefit from PrEP and a majority (83%) thought PrEP should be offered.

Conclusion There is widespread support and interest in US Army PrEP programs, however, self-reported knowledge is low. Successful PrEP implementation will require education and training of the healthcare provider workforce to improve knowledge and mitigate concerns about PrEP.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.