Article Text

P1.10 Oral fluid based rapid syphilis testing
  1. Chelsea Shannon1,
  2. CC Bristow2,
  3. SM Herbst De Cortina1,
  4. JJ Chang1,
  5. JD Klausner1
  1. 1University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  2. 2University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA


Introduction Point-of-care syphilis testing currently uses fingerstick blood to identify Treponema pallidum (TP) antibodies by qualitative immunoassay. However, oral fluid testing is highly preferred by patients. We aimed to determine if rapid tests intended for whole blood could be used to detect treponemal antibody in oral fluid.

Methods Oral fluid was collected at the UCLA Care Clinic from 49 participants using Oasis SuperSAL (Vancouver, WA). The device uses an absorbent cylindrical pad to collect and filter ~1 mL of oral fluid. Oral fluid filtrate was evaluated with 3 rapid syphilis tests: SD Bioline Syphilis 3.0 (SD), MedMira Reveal TP (MM), and First Response Anti-TP (FR) following manufacturer directions for whole blood. Reference test results, TP particle agglutination (TPPA) and rapid plasma reagin (RPR), were extracted from participants’ medical records. We used 3 different definitions as a reference standard. Definition 1: TPPA reactive. Definition 2: TPPA and RPR reactive. Definition 3: TPPA reactive and RPR titer >1:4. Specimens nonreactive on both the TPPA and RPR were considered negative. We calculated specificity and sensitivity for each definition, and used the exact binomial method to determine 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results With definitions 1, 2 and 3 respectively, SD sensitivity was 86.4% (CI: 65.1, 97.1), 93% (CI: 66.1,99.8), 100% (CI: 59.0,100); MM sensitivity was 6.3% (CI: 0.2,30.2), 9.1% (CI: 0.2,41.2), 16.7% (CI: 0.4,64.1); and FR sensitivity was 25% (CI: 8.7,49.1), 25% (CI: 5.5,57.2), 14.3% (CI: 0.4,57.9). SD specificity was 56% (CI: 36.5,75.5), MM specificity was 100% (CI: 35.9,99.6) and FR specificity was 100% (CI: 83.9,100).

Conclusion The high sensitivity of the SD test suggests a strong potential for oral fluid-based rapid syphilis testing. SD sensitivity increased with RPR titer. False positive results may be associated with the presence of non-venereal treponemal antibodies in oral fluid. The MM and FR tests had low sensitivity, perhaps due to differences in treponemal targets. Further research and development are needed.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.