Objectives We aimed to investigate how an infection with Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) influenced patients’ well-being and whether there were differences due to gender, age or relationship status, in an effort to strengthen preventive measures and provide better healthcare for patients with CT.
Methods Patients diagnosed with CT in the county of Västerbotten, Sweden, were asked to fill out a questionnaire about their feelings, thoughts and actions after CT diagnosis. The patients were also asked to fill in the validated questionnaires Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test. Between February 2015 and January 2017, 128 patients (74 women and 54 men) were included in the study.
Results After being diagnosed with CT, men were generally less worried than women (P<0.001). Women worried more about not being able to have children (P<0.001) and about having other STIs (P=0.001) than men did. Men felt less angry (P=0.001), less bad (P<0.001), less dirty (P<0.001) and less embarrassed (P=0.011) than women did. Nineteen per cent of men and 48% of women reported symptoms of anxiety. The majority of both men (60%) and women (72%) had a risk consumption of alcohol.
Conclusion Women and men reacted differently when diagnosed with CT. Women worried more about complications and more often blamed themselves for being infected. Being aware of these gender differences may be important when planning preventive measures and during counselling of CT-infected patients. Persons working with patients with CT must also be aware of the high frequency of harmful alcohol consumption among their patients.
- chlamydia infection
- sexual health
- chlamydia trachomatis
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Handling editor Jackie A Cassell
Contributors NA performed the analyses and participated in the interpretation of the results and the drafting and revision of the manuscript. HC participated in the design and the drafting and revision of the manuscript. UJ participated in the analyses, the interpretation of the results and the revision of the manuscript. JB participated in the design and the revision of the manuscript. EN designed the study and participated in the interpretation of the results and the drafting and revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding The study was funded by the Västerbotten County Council.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval The study was approved by the local ethical review board at Umeå University (08–080M).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.