Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original article
Self-perceived risk of STIs in a population-based study of Scandinavian women
  1. Sonia Guleria1,
  2. Mette Tuxen Faber1,
  3. Bo T Hansen2,
  4. Lisen Arnheim-Dahlström3,
  5. Kai-Li Liaw4,
  6. Christian Munk1,
  7. Mari Nygård2,
  8. Susanne Krüger Kjær1,5
  1. 1 Unit of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
  2. 2 Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
  3. 3 Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  4. 4 Epidemiology at Merck, Merck Research Laboratories, Kenilworth, NJ, USA
  5. 5 Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copehagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Professor Susanne Krüger Kjær, Unit of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark; susanne{at}cancer.dk

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Catherine H Mercer

  • Contributors CM, BTH, MN, LA-D, K-LL and SKK designed the questionnaire and conceived the study. CM, BTH, MN, LA-D and SKK collected data. SG and MTF conducted analyses and drafted the paper. All authors contributed to the writing of this paper by data interpretation and critical revision of drafts. All authors approved the final draft.

  • Funding Merck & Co., Inc. sponsored the data collection of the study (grant numbers EPO 8014.016 and EPO 8014.033). SG is supported by internal funding from Danish Cancer Research Center, Unit of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes.

  • Competing interests CM received lecture fees and support for conference participation from Sanofi Pasteur MSD. MN has received research grants from MSD/Merck through the affiliating institute. LA-D has received grant support from Merck, Sanofi Pasteur MSD and GlaxoSmithKline. K-LL is an employee at Merck Sharp & Dome Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, and may own stock or stock options in Merck. SKK has received lecture fees, scientific advisory board fees from Merck and Sanofi Pasteur MSD and unrestricted research grants through the affiliating institute from Merck.

  • Ethics approval In Denmark, approval was obtained from the Data Protection Agency. Approval from the Scientific Ethical Committee is not required in Denmark for questionnaire studies that do not include collection of biological samples. In Norway and Sweden the studies were approved by respective Research Ethics Committee/Data Protection Agency (Norway: 2011/1376 A, 8 September 2011 and Sweden: 04-795/4, 24 November 2004).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Catherine H Mercer

  • Contributors CM, BTH, MN, LA-D, K-LL and SKK designed the questionnaire and conceived the study. CM, BTH, MN, LA-D and SKK collected data. SG and MTF conducted analyses and drafted the paper. All authors contributed to the writing of this paper by data interpretation and critical revision of drafts. All authors approved the final draft.

  • Funding Merck & Co., Inc. sponsored the data collection of the study (grant numbers EPO 8014.016 and EPO 8014.033). SG is supported by internal funding from Danish Cancer Research Center, Unit of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes.

  • Competing interests CM received lecture fees and support for conference participation from Sanofi Pasteur MSD. MN has received research grants from MSD/Merck through the affiliating institute. LA-D has received grant support from Merck, Sanofi Pasteur MSD and GlaxoSmithKline. K-LL is an employee at Merck Sharp & Dome Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, and may own stock or stock options in Merck. SKK has received lecture fees, scientific advisory board fees from Merck and Sanofi Pasteur MSD and unrestricted research grants through the affiliating institute from Merck.

  • Ethics approval In Denmark, approval was obtained from the Data Protection Agency. Approval from the Scientific Ethical Committee is not required in Denmark for questionnaire studies that do not include collection of biological samples. In Norway and Sweden the studies were approved by respective Research Ethics Committee/Data Protection Agency (Norway: 2011/1376 A, 8 September 2011 and Sweden: 04-795/4, 24 November 2004).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.