Objectives New molecular techniques have allowed describing groups of bacterial communities in the vagina (community state types (CST)) that could play an important role in Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infection. Our aim was to describe the distribution of CST in a population of young women in France.
Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out in June 2015 among anonymous young women attending a STI clinic in Bordeaux, France. Participants provided a vaginal sample for CT screening and sociodemographic data. CT was diagnosed using the Aptima-combo 2 transcription-mediated-amplification assay. Vaginal microbiota composition was characterised using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing.
Results Microbiota composition and CT status were available for 132 women. CST dominated by Lactobacillus crispatus (CST-I), L. iners (CST-III) and a diversity of anaerobes (CST-IV) represented 37.1%, 38.6% and 22.0% of the sample, respectively. Twenty-one out of 132 women were CT positive. Proportions of CT-positive women were higher for samples belonging to CST-III (21.6%) and CST-IV (17.2%) than to CST-I (8.2%).
Conclusions Five CST were found in 132 young women from a STI clinic in France. These CSTs were not significantly associated with CT but higher proportions of CT-positive women were found in CST-III and CST-IV, consistent with a previous study in the Netherlands. Though our study lacked statistical power and was cross-sectional, it is a necessary first step to understand the structure of the vaginal microbiota in French women with or without infection before performing in-depth longitudinal studies.
- community state type
- 16S rRNA gene
- microbial consortia
- chlamydia trachomatis
- (bacterial) sexually transmitted infections
- bacterial vaginosis
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Handling editor Jackie A Cassell
Contributors JT was a major contributor in data analysis, with support from AT, JR and ED-A. JT wrote the manuscript. BdB, ILH, CB and ED-A were major contributors in the conception of the study. BdB and JR were major contributors in biological and bioinformatics analyses. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding This study was funded by the 2013 Institut National du Cancer, Institut de Recherche en Santé Publique (INCa-IReSP) call for projects ‘Recherche Prévention Primaire’ (Reference number: A15012LS).
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval CNIL registration number: 1928790.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.