Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Original article
Extent and selectivity of sexual orientation disclosure and its association with HIV and other STI testing patterns among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men
  1. Rayner Kay Jin Tan1,
  2. Alvin Kuo Jing Teo1,
  3. Nashwinder Kaur2,
  4. Jack Harrison-Quintana3,
  5. Chen Seong Wong2,
  6. Mark I-Cheng Chen1,2
  1. 1 Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
  2. 2 National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore, Singapore
  3. 3 Grindr for Equality, Grindr LLC, Los Angeles, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to Rayner Kay Jin Tan, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Singapore, Singapore 117549, Singapore; rayner.tan{at}u.nus.edu

Abstract

Objectives Gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in Singapore may fear disclosing their sexual orientation to others due to negative societal attitudes, and the law that criminalises sexual relations between men, which may, in turn, impede access to HIV/sexually transmitted infection (STI)-related health services. This study attempts to determine how selective disclosure to varying social groups, and the extent of disclosure, may serve to impact HIV/STI testing patterns among GBMSM.

Methods In this observational study, we recruited GBMSM in Singapore through an online cross-sectional survey disseminated via the smartphone app Grindr from 14 January to 11 February 2018. Respondents provided information on their sociodemographic characteristics, disclosure of sexual orientation towards other lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning (LGBTQ) individuals, non-LGBTQ family members, non-LGBTQ friends and non-LGBTQ colleagues, along with their HIV/STI testing patterns. Extent of disclosure was defined as the number of social groups that a participant had disclosed his sexual orientation to. Statistical analyses were conducted through descriptive statistics, multivariable binary, ordinal, and multinomial logistic regression models.

Results We recruited 1339 respondents, of which 1098 who had provided their response to questions on HIV/STI testing were included in the analytic sample. Multivariable analyses indicated that disclosure towards non-LGBTQ family members (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.85, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.07) and other LGBTQ individuals (aOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.37) were positively associated with recent HIV testing, whereas disclosure towards non-LGBTQ colleagues (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.22) was positively associated with regular HIV testing. Extent of disclosure exhibited a positive, dose–response relationship with all testing outcomes.

Conclusions Results indicate how the fear of being identified as an LGBTQ individual may deter GBMSM from getting tested for HIV and other STIs. Health services should bridge the gaps to accessing healthcare among individuals who fear being stigmatised for attending sexual health-specific clinics or being identified as GBMSM.

  • HIV testing
  • sexual health
  • homosexuality
  • testing

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Adam Huw Bourne

  • Contributors RKJT, AKJT, NK, JH-Q, MI-CC and CSW contributed to the survey design, oversight of recruitment, and data collection. RKJT, AKJT and MI-CC cleaned and analysed the data. RKJT and AKJT wrote the paper. RKJT, AKJT, NK, JH-Q, MI-CC and CSW reviewed the paper.

  • Funding This publication is funded by the National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was obtained from the institutional review board at the National University of Singapore (NUS-IRB Reference Code S-17–335) prior to data collection.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.