Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P085 Relative contribution of general practices and sexual health centres in STI consultations in the netherlands
  1. Isabel Slurink1,
  2. Karlijn Groen2,
  3. C Arguedas Flores2,
  4. Michelle Kroone3,
  5. Arjan Hogewoning4,
  6. Alewijn Ott5,
  7. Wim Niessen6,
  8. Nicole Dukers-Muijrers7,
  9. Christian Hoebe8,
  10. Hannelore Götz9,
  11. Bram Meima10,
  12. Femke Koedijk11,
  13. Karlijn Kampman11,
  14. Jan Van Bergen1
  1. 1National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre For Infectious Disease Control, Bilthoven, Netherlands
  2. 2Amsterdam University Medical Center, Department of General Practice, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  3. 3Public Health Service Amsterdam, Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  4. 4Public Health Service Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Infectious Diseases, Infection and Immunity Institute (AI and II), Epidemiology and Surveillance Unit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  5. 5Certe, Medical Microbiology, Groningen, Netherlands
  6. 6Municipal Public Health Service Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
  7. 7Public Health Service South Limburg, Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases and Environmental Health, Heerlen, Netherlands
  8. 8Public Health Service South Limburg, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases and Environmental Health, Medical Microbiology, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Heerlen, Netherlands
  9. 91 Public Health Service Rotterdam Rijnmond; 2 Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam; 3 National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 1 Public Health/Sexual Health; 2 Department of Public Health; 3 Epidemiology and Surveillance Unit, Centre For Infectious Disease Control, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  10. 101 Municipality of Rotterdam; 2 Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, 2 Research And Business Intelligence; 2 Public Health, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  11. 11Public Health Service Twente, Sexual Health, Twente, Netherlands


Background Dutch estimates suggest that general practitioners (GPs) perform two-third of all STI consultations, and centres for sexual health (CSH) account for most of the remaining consultations. Yet, a comparison of consultation rates by both providers is hampered due to separate surveillance systems. We assessed the distribution of STI consultations (defined as urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) test-rates) in five regions.

Methods Data (2011 to 2016) on laboratory testing and diagnosis of urogenital CT were retrieved from CSH at public health services and laboratories in five Dutch geographical regions, aggregated by sex and age category (15–24 and 25–64 years). Regions included Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Northeast –Netherlands (N-NL), Twente and Maastricht. Using negative binomial regression, we tested for time-trends in CT test-rate per 10,000 population at GPs and CSH within five regions and differences between the providers by region.

Results The five regions included in this study varied from mostly rural (N-NL) to highly urban (Amsterdam and Rotterdam). The relative contribution of GPs in consultation rate decreased over time in Amsterdam (60.0–47.8%), Twente (78.6–61.4%), Maastricht (59.2–47.2%), N-NL (82.4–76.9%), but not in Rotterdam (65.4–67.0%). This decrease resulted from an increase in all CSH consultation rates and a slight decrease in GP consultation rate (except for Rotterdam). Women and persons aged 25–64 years were more likely to be tested by GPs compared to CSH (relative risks of 5 regions ranging from 1.47–4.76; 1.58–7.43 respectively). All regions combined, the average yearly positivity rate was 9.2% at the GP and 10.7% at the CSH.

Conclusion GPs are still a major contributor in STI consultations, yet the CSH- contribution has increased between 2011 and 2016. In urban regions, the CSH has a considerable role, whereas in rural areas the GP provides most consultations. An explanation for differences may be CSH accessibility.

Disclosure No significant relationships.

  • health services

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.