Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P413 A dyadic intervention for STI prevention in youth: feasibility, acceptability & preliminary effectiveness
Free
  1. Pamela Matson1,
  2. Julia Rowell1,
  3. Jacquelin Toppins1,
  4. Colin Woods1,
  5. Steven Huettner1,
  6. Camille Robinson1,
  7. Errol Fields1,
  8. Arik Marcell1,
  9. Maria Trent2
  1. 1Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Pediatrics, Baltimore, USA
  2. 2Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Ped Gen Pediatrics Adoles Medicine, Baltimore, USA

Abstract

Background Sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention strategies for adolescents and young adults (AYA) primarily rely on individual approaches leaving sexual partners with significant unmet sexual and reproductive health needs. This paper describes the research methods and preliminary feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of a dyad-based behavioral intervention that augments individual evidence-based interventions with joint health education counseling for STI-affected AYA dyads within a primary care setting.

Methods Index participants were AYA 15–25 years, engaged in heterosexual intercourse, history of positive STI, Baltimore City resident, willing to recruit their main sexual partner for the study. Exclusions include: one or both partners has HIV infection, pending incarceration, greater than five years age difference, evidence of partner violence. Index and partner completed a single individual session separately with a gender-matched health educator. Dyads were randomized to receive an additional joint debriefing session together, and separately completed a telephone interview 6 weeks post intervention.

Results 18 dyads were recruited over 11 months. Mean age [range] females: 21.5 [17–26], males: 22.7 [18–27]. Mean age difference within dyads: 1.4 years. Acceptability was high with 100% agree/strongly agree it was a great opportunity to reflect on relationship with their partner and a worthwhile use of their time. More in the intervention group endorsed feeling closer to their partner than when they arrived for the visit (94 vs 88%). 100% of dyads were still together at 6 weeks. Participants reported high confidence that they could negotiate condom use with their partner even if partner did not want to, mean 9.3 (sd =2.2) out of 10.

Conclusion AYA endorsed helpfulness of the intervention. Participants showed high confidence in condom negotiation with their partner 6 weeks following the intervention. Recruitment of AYA dyads is a challenge, and more successful with young adults; however, dyadic interventions show promising impact on behavior that can prevent STI.

Disclosure No significant relationships.

  • youth

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.