Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P446 Use of antibiotic prophylaxis for sexually transmitted infections among gay and bisexual men in australia
  1. Vincent Cornelisse1,
  2. Denton Callander2,
  3. Christopher Fairley3,
  4. Darren Russell4
  1. 1Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Carlton, Australia
  2. 2New York University, School of Medicine, New York, USA
  3. 3Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Melbourne, Australia
  4. 4Queensland Health, Cairns Sexual Health Service, Cairns, Australia


Background Antibiotic prophylaxis can reduce the risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), but concerns remain about its safety and feasibility of its implementation. We conducted an online survey to quantify current use of and interest in antibiotic prophylaxis among Australian gay and bisexual men.

Methods From June to December 2018 our survey was promoted through gay community organisations and Melbourne Sexual Health Centre. The survey asked about demographics, sexual history, drug use, use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), history of STIs, use of antibiotic prophylaxis and attitudes towards antibiotic prophylaxis. We used logistic regression analyses to compare responses from respondents who had used antibiotic prophylaxis, respondents who had not used but were interested, and respondents who were not interested.

Results A total of 517 survey responses were complete: 68 respondents (13%) had previously used antibiotics to prevent STIs and 323 (63%) expressed interest in using antibiotic prophylaxis. In univariate analyses, compared to respondents with no previous use and no interest, users of antibiotic prophylaxis were older (Mdn=43 years vs Mdn=34 years, p=0.018), had higher numbers of sexual partners (M=14 vs M=5, p=0.002), were more likely to report recent group sex (64.7% vs 42.1%, p=0.003), to be using HIV PrEP (66.2% vs 35.7%, p<0.001), and report a recent bacterial STI diagnosis (57.4% vs 31.0%, p<0.001). However, in multivariate analysis, users of antibiotic prophylaxis were not more likely to report a recent bacterial STI diagnosis (aOR=1.65, 95%CI 0.8–3.5), after adjusting for age, sexual partner numbers, drug use, and PrEP use.

Conclusion A majority of respondents expressed interest in antibiotic prophylaxis and 13% had used antibiotic prophylaxis. Users of antibiotic prophylaxis reported more STI risk factors and had more bacterial STIs than non-users. However, the use of antibiotic prophylaxis was not independently associated with a higher risk of STI diagnosis.

Disclosure No significant relationships.

  • ART
  • PrEP

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.