Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P561 Developing surveillance tools to measure MSM’s HIV infection risk in the era of complex biobehavioural prevention strategies
  1. Jamie Frankis1,
  2. Paul Flowers2,
  3. Lesley Wallace3,
  4. David Goldberg3,
  5. Martin Holt4,
  6. Lisa Mcdaid3
  1. 1Glasgow Caledonian University, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow, UK
  2. 2University of Glasgow, MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow, UK
  3. 3Health Protection Scotland, QU, UK
  4. 4UNSW Sydney, Centre for Social Research in Health, Sydney, Australia


Background Behavioural surveillance enables monitoring of disease epidemics, assessment of health promotion, development of health policy and service planning. However, the emergence of multiple effective biobehavioral risk management strategies to prevent HIV transmission (including PrEP, treatment-as-prevention (TasP), negotiated safety (NS), serosorting, condom use), demands new surveillance tools able to reflect this complexity. Here, we critically discuss our new surveillance tool, developed to measure MSM’s biobehavioural HIV risk-taking.

Methods Items were developed with surveillance experts in Scotland and Australia, piloted within Scotland, then delivered within the Scottish Gay Men’s Bar Survey (n=972 MSM), across the commercial gay scenes of Scotland’s two largest cities in 2017. Participants were asked about sex with regular and casual partners separately, condom use and condomless anal intercourse (CAI), their HIV status, PrEP use and their partners’ HIV and undetectable viral load (UVL) status.

Results Overall, 5.6% of participants were HIV+. For our HIV-/untested participants, 67.7% were categorised as ‘lower risk’ since, in the last year, they reported; (i) PrEP use (4.5%) (ii) no CAI (37.1%) (iii) Negotiated safety; CAI with 1 regular HIV- partner (16%) (iv) TasP; CAI with 1 regular HIV+ UVL partner (0.4%) (v) Serosorting; CAI with casual and/or multiple regular HIV- partners (4.1%) (vi) Both serosorting and TasP CAI with multiple regular and casual partners (5.4%) The remaining 32.3% were categorised as ‘higher risk’; HIV-/untested men not on PrEP who reported CAI with HIV status-unknown partners, or HIV+ partners with unknown/detectable viral load. Of these, 67.6% report 2+ CAI partners, making them potentially eligible for PrEP in Scotland.

Conclusion No CAI, NS and PrEP were the key biobehavioural risk strategies used. Two-thirds of our higher risk men could, but are yet to, benefit from PrEP. Although offering new insights, we invite critical engagement with these risk criteria which present different, yet related challenges for researchers and MSM alike.

Disclosure No significant relationships.

  • gay bisexual and other men who have sex with men

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.