Article Text
Abstract
Background Alongside traditional epidemiologic tools, network analyses and molecular epidemiology offer deeper insights into the structure of STBBI epidemics. In the context of a 2014 gonorrhea (NG) outbreak, this study sought to compare molecular networks to case-contact networks constructed from public health investigations.
Methods Data were from enhanced public health investigations of NG in Winnipeg, Canada. NG-MAST was used to determine the molecular subtypes of NG. Subtypes were described by socio-demographic/clinical characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association of socio-demographic/clinical characteristics, and having the most frequently reported subtype. Networks constructed from case-contact investigations were visualized; components were characterized with univariate network statistics, including degree centralization. Conditional uniform graph (CUG) tests assessed observed degree centralization.
Results In total, 126 NG cases were genotyped, with 41 subtypes found. Five subtypes accounted for 51% of all subtypes, with ST-3672 (n=22) predominant. At the bivariate level, infection with ST-3672 was associated with younger age (62% of those infected were 15–19 years old, p=0.002), and chlamydia co-infection (67% vs 37%, p=0.012). In multivariable analysis, age group remained significant, while an interaction between inner-core residency and chlamydia co-infection was detected. Case-contact networks were highly-fragmented, consisting mainly of dyads and triads. Of 85 components, the largest component included 6 nodes, while 61% were dyads. CUG testing indicated in-degree centralization was lower than expected (p<0.05). Genotyping combined with case-contact data increased the potential size and geographic reach of each component. Of potential components found after incorporating subtypes, 32% (10/33) were dyadic, with the largest component consisting of 45 nodes.
Conclusion Molecular data revealed connections that were not apparent from case-contact investigations alone, leading to more cases potentially linked together, and over a wider geographic area. A handful of subtypes were responsible for the majority of infections. Early identification of dominant subtypes may potentially curtail transmission of NG.
Disclosure No significant relationships.