Article Text

Download PDFPDF

O02.6 Extragenital mycoplasma genitalium infections amongst men who have sex with men
Free
  1. Rosie Latimer1,
  2. Lenka Vodstrcil2,
  3. Tim Read1,
  4. Vesna De Petra3,
  5. Christopher Fairley2,
  6. Deborah Williamson4,
  7. Eric Chow2,
  8. Catriona Bradshaw2
  1. 1Monash University, Central Clinical School, Carlton, Australia
  2. 2Alfred Health, Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Carlton, Australia
  3. 3Microbiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory, Department Of Microbiology And Immunology, The University Of Melbourne At The Peter Doherty Institute For Infection And Immunity, Melbourne, Australia
  4. 4The University of Melbourne at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Microbiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory, Parkville, Australia

Abstract

Background There are limited data on the prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) coinfection with rectal chlamydia and rectal gonorrhoea infections in men who have sex with men (MSM). There are also few studies examining the prevalence of pharyngeal MG in MSM. Using a highly sensitive transcription mediated amplification assay, this study aimed to determine the proportion of rectal chlamydial and gonococcal infections in MSM that are co-infected with rectal MG, and the proportion of MSM with MG detected in the pharynx.

Methods This study was conducted at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre in Victoria, Australia. Consecutive routinely collected rectal swabs from MSM, that previously tested positive for chlamydia (N=212) or gonorrhoea (N=212) using Aptima Combo 2 (Hologic, San Diego), were tested for MG co-infection using the Aptima Mycoplasma genitalium Assay (Hologic, San Diego). Consecutive pharyngeal samples (N=500) from MSM were also tested for MG using Aptima Mycoplasma genitalium Assay. Samples were linked to demographic and epidemiological data, as well as symptoms and clinical diagnosis, and irreversibly de-identified prior to MG testing.

Results Rectal-MG was co-detected in 27/212 chlamydial (13%, 95%CI 9–18) and in 29/212 gonorrhoea (14%, 95%CI 9–19) samples, with no difference in the proportion positive for MG between the two groups (p=0.774). MSM with rectal-gonorrhoea and MG co-infection were more likely to be HIV positive than those infected with gonorrhoea alone (OR 2.96, 95%CI 1.21–7.26, p=0.023). Pharyngeal-MG was detected in 8/464 consecutive samples (2%, 95%CI 1–3%).

Conclusion We found high and identical rates of MG coinfection (13–14%) in MSM with chlamydial or gonorrhoeal rectal infection. Macrolide resistance in MG exceeds 80% in MSM at our service. Rectal gonorrhoea and chlamydia treatment involves use of azithromycin. These data highlight the prevalence of unidentified MG which is inadvertently exposed azithromycin. Using highly sensitive diagnostic methods, pharyngeal-MG was only detected in 2% of MSM in this study.

Disclosure No significant relationships.

  • Mycoplasma genitalium

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.