Article Text

Download PDFPDF

O12.1 Exploring relationship duration among gay and bisexual men: a longitudinal event-level analysis
Free
  1. Kiffer Card1,
  2. Heather Armstrong2,
  3. Shenyi Pan3,
  4. Nathan Lachowsky1,
  5. Robert Hogg3,
  6. Eric Roth4,
  7. David Moore3
  1. 1University of Victoria, School of Public Health and Social Policy, Victoria, Canada
  2. 2University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
  3. 3British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada
  4. 4University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada

Abstract

Background We characterized event-level relationship patterns of gay and bisexual men (gbMSM)’s long- and short-term with the goal of improving intimacy, well-being, and the control of sexually transmitted infections.

Methods Between 2012–2015, sexually-active gbMSM, aged >16, were recruited in Metro Vancouver using respondent-driven sampling. Participants completed computer-assisted self-interviews at six-month intervals for up to 12 visits. At each visit, participants described their last sexual encounter with up to five of their most recent partners. Relationship duration was measured as the months between their first and most recent sexual encounter with each partner. Multivariable generalized estimating equations with RDS-chain, participant, and visit effects were used to identify sociodemographic, psychosocial, and behavioural factors associated with relationship duration.

Results A total of 10,424 events were reported by 762 gbMSM (median=13/person, Q1-Q3:5–24). Median relationship duration was <1 month (Q1-Q3: 0–3) and the median number of sex events between partners was 1 (Q1-Q3: 1–1). Analyses indicate that longer relationship duration was associated with increasing age of participants (p<0.001); indigenous ethnicity (versus White; p=0.003); marijuana use before/during sex (p=0.014); and having met at a bathhouse (p=0.004), bar/club (p<0.001), through friends (p<0.001), or at another location (p=0.002; versus ‘online’). Shorter relationship duration was associated with higher communal altruism (p=0.019); bisexual identity (versus gay; p=0.004); Latin American ethnicity (versus White; p=0.028); living with HIV (p=0.0004); not knowing the event-level partner’s serostatus (p<0.001); engaging in insertive condom-protected anal sex with even-level partner (p=0.031); engaging in event-level group sex (p=0.001); and having sex at a park (p=0.004), hotel (p=0.043), private sex party (p=0.019), or other location (p=0.002; versus ‘home’).

Conclusion Partner meeting location, personal identity, and risk management behaviours are key correlates of relationship duration – with shorter, often one-time, relationships being characterized by both risk (e.g., group sex, public sex, unknown partner serostatus) and risk management (e.g., condom use).

Disclosure No significant relationships.

  • gay bisexual and other men who have sex with men

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.