You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Oral Presentations
O12 – UNDERSTANDING RELATIONSHIPS AND PARTNER STRATEGIES FOR STI CONTROL
Tuesday, July 16, 2019 4:15 PM – 5:45 PM
O12.5 Partner notification outcomes for chlamydia/gonorrhea cases diagnosed through clinics vs getcheckedonline in british columbia
Free
  1. Arina Zamanpour1,
  2. Jason Wong1,
  3. Devon Haag1,
  4. Troy Grennan1,
  5. Dee Hoyano2,
  6. Sophie Bannar-Martin2,
  7. Silvina Mema3,
  8. Maja Karlsson3,
  9. Christopher Fairley4,
  10. Gina Ogilvie1,
  11. Mark Gilbert1
  1. 1British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, Canada
  2. 2Island Health Authority, Victoria, Canada
  3. 3Interior Health Authority, Kelowna, Canada
  4. 4Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

Background GetCheckedOnline (GCO) is an internet-based testing service for sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections in British Columbia (BC), Canada that is highly accepted by clients. The literature has not addressed whether treatment and partner notification (PN) outcomes differ between clients of internet-based testing services and clinic-based clients. We sought to compare treatment uptake, engagement in PN, and PN outcomes between chlamydia (CT) and/or gonorrhea (GC) cases diagnosed through GCO and two provincially-operated sexually transmitted infection clinics.

Methods A matched case-control study was conducted among CT/GC cases in BC from 2016–2018. All cases diagnosed through GCO were selected and matched to two clinic cases (controls) based on diagnosis, gender, age group, and specimen collection date. Using a cascade of care, PN outcomes were compared between partners of GCO and clinic cases. Bivariate comparisons were conducted using chi-square or Fisher’s exact test.

Results There were 257 GCO cases matched to 514 clinic cases. Treatment uptake did not differ between GCO (254/257, 98.9%) and clinic (513/514, 99.8%) cases. There was no difference in the proportion of notified partners between GCO (176/287, 61.3%) and clinic cases (338/520, 65.0%) although a greater proportion (P<0.01) of notifiable partners reported by clinic cases were notified by public health (44/520, 8.5%) vs. GCO cases (6/287, 2.1%). Among all notified partners, clinic cases reported a greater proportion (P<0.01) of tested partners (114/338, 33.7%) than did GCO cases (38/176, 21.6%). Of all notifiable partners, positivity was higher (P<0.01) among clinic cases (93/520, 17.9%) than GCO cases (29/287, 10.1%).

Conclusion GCO clients diagnosed with CT or GC demonstrated similar treatment uptake and engagement in PN to clinic clients. The difference in partner testing may be due to different populations being reached by internet-based testing and merits further investigation. The high positivity rate among partners underscores the importance of PN.

Disclosure No significant relationships.

  • partner notification

https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-sti.174

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.