You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Poster Presentations
PS01 – POSTER VIEWING SESSION – MONDAY
Monday, July 15, 2019 5:45 PM – 7:00 PM
P012 A process evaluation of an incentivized home-based intervention to test and start (HITS) in rural kwazulu-natal, south africa
Free
  1. Oluwafemi Adeagbo1,
  2. Frank Tanser1,
  3. Velaphi Gumede1,
  4. Thulile Mathenjwa2,
  5. Philippa Matthews3,
  6. Sally Wyke4,
  7. Till Bärnighausen5,
  8. Deenan Pillay2,
  9. Nuala Mcgrath6,
  10. Ann Blandford7,
  11. Janet Seeley8,
  12. Maryam Shahmanesh9
  1. 1Africa Health Research Institute, Social Science Research and Ethics, Mtubatuba, South Africa
  2. 2Africa Health Research Institute, Mtubatuba, South Africa
  3. 3Africa Health Research Institute, Clinical Research, Mtubatuba, South Africa
  4. 4University of Glasgow, College of Social Sciences, Glasgow, UK
  5. 5Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
  6. 6University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  7. 7University College London, Institute of Digital Health, London, UK
  8. 8London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  9. 9University College London, London, UK

Abstract

Background Despite freely available HIV testing and treatment, many men do not access HIV treatment and care in South Africa. We conducted home-based intervention to test and start (HITS) - a factorial design randomised controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT03757104). HITS is designed to assess the effectiveness of two financial micro-incentives (R50[$3] food vouchers) for home-based HIV testing and, following a HIV-positive test, to link to HIV care; and/or a male-targeted counselling application to support home-based testing (EPIC-HIV1) and to support men linking to care (EPIC-HIV2). The research was conducted in an HIV-hyperendemic setting in rural KwaZulu-Natal.

Methods We conducted a process evaluation to understand the impact of HITS intervention on the decision of men to test for HIV and/or engage in HIV care. Thirty men (16–73 years) were purposively selected in the three intervention arms (ten per arm) and interviewed between August and December 2018. Emerging themes were thematically analysed following an interpretivist approach.

Results Although participants welcomed the male-centred intervention, some felt that the voucher amount was too small. Overall, many participants described the voucher, EPIC-HIV, and the convenience and privacy of home-based testing as ‘catalysts’ to test or link to care irrespective of their reported intrinsic motivations to know their status or concerns around HIV related sexual risk behaviours. One-third of the interviewees were first-time testers. Despite the incentives, two out of the five men who tested positive reported that they have not linked to care because they feared stigmatisation at local clinics.

Conclusion Generally, the HITS intervention influenced men’s motivation to test and access care, but some respondents felt the incentive was insufficient to overcome some barriers of accessing HIV care at fixed clinics. To achieve the 90–90–90 targets among men in our setting, provision of decentralised, non-judgmental and convenient incentivised HIV care services could increase uptake of HIV testing and treatment.

Disclosure No significant relationships.

  • diagnosis

https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-sti.221

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.