Objectives Women attending STI clinics are not routinely tested for oropharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections. We aimed to assess spontaneous clearance of oropharyngeal CT and cure after antibiotic treatment in women.
Methods Women with vaginal or rectal CT (n=560) were recruited at STI clinics in 2016–2017, as part of the FemCure study (prospective cohort study). We included participants’ data from week −1, that is, the diagnosis at initial visit, when clinics applied selective oropharyngeal testing. At week −1, a total of 241 women were oropharyngeally tested (30 positive) and 319 were untested. All FemCure participants provided nurse-collected oropharyngeal samples at study enrolment, that is, week 0, just prior to treatment (n=560), and after treatment at weeks 4 (n=449), 8 (n=433) and 12 (n=427). Samples were tested by nucleic acid amplification test, and at week 0 also by viability testing by viability PCR. Proportions of oropharyngeal CT test results were presented to represent spontaneous clearance and cure.
Results Of 30 women diagnosed with oropharyngeal CT at week −1, fifteen (50%) were negative at week 0 after a median of 9 days, that is, ‘spontaneous clearance’. At week 0, a total of 560 participants were tested, and 46 (8.8%) were oropharyngeal CT positive; 12 of them (26.1%) had viable CT. Of the 46 positive, 36 women had an oropharyngeal test after treatment; 97.2% (35/36) were negative at week 4, that is, ‘cure’. Of all women with follow-up visits, the proportion of oropharyngeal CT positive was between 0.5% and 1.6% between weeks 4 and 12. Of those not tested at week −1 (n=319), 8.5% (n=27) were oropharyngeal positive at week 0.
Conclusions The clinical importance of oropharyngeal CT in women is debated. We demonstrated that spontaneous clearance of oropharyngeal CT among women is common; of those who did not clear for CT, three-quarters had non-viable CT. After regular treatment with azithromycin or doxycycline, cure rate (97%) of oropharyngeal CT is excellent.
Trial registration number NCT02694497.
- Chlamydia trachomatis
- oral sex
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infection is the most commonly reported treatable bacterial STI in high-income countries.1 2 CT disproportionally affects women, who may develop pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, tubal infertility and chronic abdominal pain.3 4 CT can occur at the vaginal site, the rectal site and the oropharyngeal site. The prevalence of oropharyngeal CT is 0.2%–3.2% (median 1.7%) in women, 0%–3.6% (median 1.7%) in men who have sex with men (MSM) and 0%–22.0% (median 1.6%) among men who have sex with women.5 Oropharyngeal CT may frequently occur as a single infection (thus without genital or rectal CT); this was the case in 53% of 148 MSM and 32% of 164 women, selectively tested, at the STI clinic in Amsterdam.6 Data on oropharyngeal CT in women are scarce as women are not routinely tested for oropharyngeal CT, while in MSM oropharyngeal testing is an emerging practice.5 Oropharyngeal CT infections have been considered low bacterial load infections7 that are frequently self-limiting.6 8 Concerns were raised that oropharyngeal CT infection may initiate a reservoir of infection, that is, via the gastrointestinal tract.9 To date, the role of oropharyngeal CT in further CT transmission or in the capacity to cause clinically relevant infections is unclear, and thereby the need for oropharyngeal testing in women is debated.10
As part of the FemCure study,11 we followed women diagnosed with vaginal or rectal CT in routine STI clinic care, and have taken the opportunity to also assess oropharyngeal CT over time. We evaluated clearance of oropharyngeal CT between diagnosis and treatment (ie, spontaneous clearance), clearance of oropharyngeal CT at 4 weeks after treatment (ie, cure) and the occurrence of oropharyngeal CT up to 12 weeks after regular treatment for rectal or vaginal CT. In addition, next to assessing CT-DNA positivity, we assessed the CT viability.
This is a prospective cohort study, as part of the FemCure study.11 The study was conducted at three STI clinics of the Public Health Services South Limburg, Rotterdam-Rijnmond and Amsterdam, which together conduct almost half of all STI clinic consultations in the Netherlands. We include data from participants’ clinic diagnosis visit, before enrolment at week −1, when selective oropharyngeal testing was applied per routine care protocol; based on being a sex worker, being notified or orally exposed as indication for oropharyngeal testing, as oropharyngeal screening is not standardly recommended in women.12 13 Oropharyngeal tested women, in most cases, reported unprotected sex with a casual partner. Clinics applied the same procedures using different nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) with comparable high sensitivity for diagnostic testing.13 Women who, at week −1, were diagnosed with a vaginal or a rectal CT infection between April 2016 and September 2017 could be included in the study, at week 0, when they returned to the clinic for treatment, on the day of and just prior to treatment. Treatment was according to regular care protocol12; that is, either by a 7-day course of doxycycline 100 mg orally twice daily or a 1 g single oral dose of azithromycin; treatment choice was not based on the oropharyngeal CT test result. At study enrolment, at STI clinic visits at week 0, just prior to treatment for vaginal or rectal CT, and at weeks 4, 8 and 12 after treatment, study nurses collected oropharyngeal samples (swab) from participants. As these study samples were tested afterwards, participants were untreated for oropharyngeal CT during follow-up. At week 12, women received a routine STI clinic check-up including oropharyngeal testing and treatment when needed. Some women became lost to follow-up (figure 1).
Two swabs were collected at week 0. A first sample was collected for viability testing and a second sample was collected for CT-DNA testing. The sample for viability testing was placed in 4 mL sucrose phosphate transport buffer and immediately stored at −80°C to maintain CT viability until laboratory analysis. The sample for CT-DNA testing was placed in COBAS buffer and used to test for CT-DNA with PCR (Roche Cobas 4800, Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), according to manufacturers’ guidelines. Second, swabs were placed in COBAS buffer for testing with quantitative PCR testing, detecting CT-DNA (Roche Cobas 4800, Roche Diagnostics), according to manufacturers’ guidelines. Of the women who tested positive in NAAT at week 0, samples were subsequently tested for viability with viability PCR (V-PCR). A positive V-PCR test indicates presence of CT-DNA from intact (ie, viable) CT organisms.14 15 Week 4, 8 and 12 samples were tested by NAAT.
Definitions and statistical analyses
Spontaneous clearance: when a woman was diagnosed by NAAT with oropharyngeal CT at week −1, and tested negative by NAAT for oropharyngeal CT when she returned for treatment at week 0.
Cure: when a woman who tested positive by NAAT for oropharyngeal CT at week 0, just prior to treatment, tested oropharyngeal CT negative by NAAT at week 4 after treatment.
We present spontaneous clearance and cure as proportions. We also present the test results at each study visit, and viability test result at week 0 as proportions. We used SPSS Statistics V.24 (IBM) for descriptive statistics.
At week −1, five hundred and thirty-one women were diagnosed with vaginal CT and 184 with rectal CT. Two hundred and forty-one women were also tested for oropharyngeal CT and 30 women were diagnosed with oropharyngeal CT. Three hundred and nineteen women were not oropharyngeal tested (figure 1). Median age was 22 years (IQR was 20–24).
Spontaneous clearance between clinic diagnosis at week −1 and treatment at week 0
The median interval between the week −1 and week 0 visits was 9 days (IQR: 7–12). In the 30 women diagnosed with oropharyngeal CT at week −1, spontaneous clearance at week 0 was observed in 15 (50% (95% CI 31.3% to 68.7%)) (table 1).
Cure at week 4 post-treatment
Of the 46 women who were CT positive at week 0, thirty-six were tested at week 4. Cure (ie, NAAT negative at week 4) was observed in 35 (97.2% (95% CI 85.5% to 99.9%)) (table 2). Cure was 93.8% (15/16) in the women who received azithromycin and 100% (20/20) in the women who received doxycycline (exact test p=0.444).
Oropharyngeal CT and viability before treatment (week 0)
At week −1, two hundred and forty-one women were oropharyngeally tested and n=30 (12.4%) tested positive for oropharyngeal CT. Of the n=30 women diagnosed with oropharyngeal CT at week −1, n=15 were oropharyngeal CT positive at the subsequent visit at week 0 (table 1). Of the 211 women who tested negative at week −1, n=4 (1.9%) were oropharyngeally positive at week 0. Of the 319 women who were oropharyngeally untested at week −1, n=27 (8.5%) were oropharyngeally CT positive at week 0.
Thus, at week 0, in total 46 (8.8%) women were oropharyngeal CT positive. Of these, 26.1% (12/46) had viable CT, that is, tested V-PCR positive. Of the 12 women with viable CT at week 0, one tested CT oropharyngeal positive at week 4 by NAAT; in fact she also tested positive at weeks 8 and 12.
Oropharyngeal CT after treatment at weeks 4, 8 and 12
Ten women had an oropharyngeal CT positive test after treatment. One woman was positive at all post-treatment visits; she reported receptive oral sex during complete follow-up. Nine women were positive at a single time point only; n=2 at week 4, n=1 at week 8, n=6 at week 12 visit. The proportion of oropharyngeal CT positive was between 0.5% and 1.6% between weeks 4 and 12 (table 2).
This is the first prospective study in women evaluating the trajectory of oropharyngeal CT infections from diagnosis to pretreatment, and until 12 weeks after treatment. We assessed spontaneous clearance and cure after standard treatment for anogenital CT infections, in women attending Dutch STI clinics.
Spontaneous oropharyngeal CT clearance was 50% (95% CI 31.3% to 68.7%) after a median of 9 days after diagnosis of oropharyngeal CT in 30 women. This is similar to results in seven women showing 57.1% with a median follow-up of 10 days,8 and slightly higher than the 36.4% observed using RNA-based testing in 55 women in a median follow-up of 9 days.6 The proportion of spontaneous clearance of oropharyngeal CT is much higher than we observed for vaginal CT (6.0%, 95% CI 4.2% to 8.4%) and rectal CT (15.8%, 95% CI 10.8% to 21.8%).16 A possible explanation is the lower initial CT bacterial load at the oropharyngeal site compared with the vaginal and the rectal site,7 because lower initial load is associated with oropharyngeal CT clearance.6 8 Of those women who remained CT positive at the oropharyngeal site at week 0, three quarters had non-viable CT only.
Cure was high for both azithromycin and doxycycline. Four weeks after treatment, 97.2% of women were negative for oropharyngeal CT. Proportions of cure were similar to those in azithromycin-treated vaginal CT (93.5% (95% CI 90.1% to 96.1%)), in doxycycline-treated vaginal CT (95.4% (95% CI 90.9% to 98.2%)) and in doxycycline-treated rectal CT (95.5% (95% CI 91.0% to 98.2%)); and higher than in azithromycin-treated rectal CT (78.5% (95% CI 72.6% to 83.7%)).17 One woman was positive at all follow-up visits until week 12; she had oropharyngeal viable CT at week 0 and was untested at week −1; she reported receptive oral sex during follow-up.
A substantial proportion (8.5%) of women with vaginal or rectal CT, and who were not tested at the oropharynx at week −1, turned out to have oropharyngeal CT (at week 0), of whom almost a third had viable CT. Since vaginal CT is a risk factor for having oropharyngeal CT,6 the proportion of all women attending STI clinics with oropharyngeal CT may be lower than observed in this study. Phillips et al showed among MSM with oropharyngeal chlamydia, that nearly three-quarters had chlamydia DNA detected in saliva, but viability was not assessed.18 The proportion of positive women with viable oropharyngeal CT was 26.1% (12/46), which is lower than proportions of viable CT that we observed in vaginally (94.0%–96.4%) and in rectally CT-infected women (58.0%–66.5%).17 Although the proportion with viable oropharyngeal CT is relatively small, it may represent relevant infections for ongoing transmission to a sexual partner via oral sex,19 but possibly also to the own rectal site, via the gastrointestinal canal.20 After treatment, following >425 women until week 12, only few women tested positive and most only at a single time point. The proportion of positive after treatment was between 0.5% and 1.6%, in line with the estimated proportion of oropharyngeal CT in women (0.2%–3.2%; median 1.7%).5
In regular care practice, oropharyngeal CT testing is not routinely performed. Thus, oropharyngeal single-site CT infections (ie, without concurrent vaginal or rectal infection) largely remain untreated in women. Our study did not include participants with single oropharyngeal CT at week −1, precluding analyses on single infections. However, single-site oropharyngeal CT spontaneous clearance has previously been found higher than concomitant oropharyngeal CT infections,6 possibly due to lower initial bacterial load.8 Still, in the STI clinic female population, part of the women with oropharyngeal CT will have vaginal CT. These women are standard tested for vaginal CT, and treated when positive, thereby as well treating a possible concurrent oropharyngeal CT. Altogether, the current study does not provide support for routine oropharyngeal CT testing in women who are already being tested for vaginal (or rectal) infection.
This study has several limitations. (1) As in all human clearance studies, the moment of infection was unknown. (2) The exact day of clearance or cure is unknown, because we did not collect daily samples. (3) Clearance may differ by genotype,21 22 but genotyping was not performed on the diagnosis, at the week −1, study samples. Genotyping would also be valuable to exclude reinfections, if these were with other genotypes. (4) Possibly, using a one time point test to assess spontaneous clearance or cure could have resulted in detecting false-negative or false-positive results.23–25 ‘On off effects’ (ie, a positive and negative test result in the same sample) might occur in samples with a low bacterial load around the detection limit, which may be more often the case in oropharyngeal CT infections. (5) The representativeness of our study is unknown. In the FemCure study, women with high education, women without a history of STI and non-Western migrant women were under-represented compared with all STI clinic women with CT infection.26 Also, STI clinic populations may not represent the general population.
To conclude, this study contributes to the growing knowledge on oropharyngeal CT. Most women diagnosed with vaginal or rectal chlamydia are not tested for CT in the oropharynx; yet 8.5% of these women tested NAAT positive for CT in the oropharynx when returning for CT treatment. However, we demonstrate that spontaneous clearance of oropharyngeal CT is substantial and higher than what is known for vaginal or rectal CT. The cure rate after regular treatment for anorectal CT infections is very high, and similar to that for vaginal CT. Our data suggest that routine universal oropharyngeal CT testing in all women, who are already tested for vaginal (or rectal CT), is of questionable importance.
Most women diagnosed with vaginal or rectal chlamydia are not tested for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) in the pharynx; 8.5% of these women tested nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) positive for CT in the oropharynx.
Of women who tested NAAT positive for CT in the oropharynx, 26.1% had viable CT.
Fifty per cent of women tested NAAT positive for chlamydia (CT) in the oropharynx were negative after a median 9 days, indicating spontaneous clearance.
Nearly all (97.2%) women tested NAAT positive for CT in the oropharynx cleared CT 4 weeks after receiving azithromycin or doxycycline.
We are grateful to the staff at the Public Health Service (GGD) South Limburg: Lisanne Eppings, Dr Ronald van Hoorn, Maria Mergelsberg, Mandy Sanders, Emily Suijlen, Bianca Penders, Helen Sijstermans and Ine de Bock; the staff at GGD Rotterdam-Rijnmond: Astrid Wielemaker, Angie Martina, Roselyne Uwimana, Mieke Illidge, Klaas de Ridder and Bram Meima for data management; and the staff at GGD Amsterdam: Titia Heijman, Dieke Martini, Myra van Leeuwen, Claudia Owusu, Jacqueline Woutersen, Princella Felipa, Mayam Amezian, Arjdal Khadija and Iris Deen, who were involved in the logistics and inclusion, and Martijn van Rooijen for data management. We also thank the staff at the laboratories of Medical Microbiology of the Maastricht University Medical Center, especially Judith Veugen, Laura Saelmans and Kevin Janssen. Also, we thank the staff of the microbiological laboratory of the GGD Amsterdam: Esther Heuser and Michelle Himschoot.
Handling editor Jonathan Ross
Contributors NHTMDM coordinated the study, performed the statistical analyses, wrote and drafted the paper. NHTMDM, CJPAH, PW, HMG, SMB, MSvdL and HDV designed the study. ML and PW coordinated the laboratory data collection and testing. All authors were involved in the study design, critically edited the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.
Funding This study is funded by a grant from the governmental organisation Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW Netherlands) (registration numbers 50-53000-98-109 and 52-2008-002).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Ethics approval All participants provided written informed consent. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee from the Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands (NL51358.068.15/METC153020, 20-01-2016) and monitored by the Clinical Trial Centre Maastricht.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. Please send an email to email@example.com.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.