You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
PostScript
Correspondence
HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use among gender-diverse people attending a sexual health service
  1. Sophie Ross1,
  2. Diego Garcia2,
  3. Giovanni Villa2,3,
  4. Jodie Crossman1,
  5. Colin Fitzpatrick1,
  6. Daniel Richardson1,2
  1. 1 Department of Sexual Health and HIV, Royal Sussex County Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
  2. 2 Department of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Brighton and Hove, UK
  3. 3 Department of Genitourinary Medicine and Infectious Diseases, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sophie Ross, Sexual health and HIV, Royal Sussex County Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK; sophie.ross5{at}nhs.net

https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2022-055649

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    There is little data on HIV prevalence or HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among gender-diverse people in the UK.1 Current guidelines recommend that PrEP be offered to transgender women (TGW) at risk of HIV through condomless anal sex and transgender men and women having condomless sex with partners.2 We aimed to explore the number of gender-diverse people who were eligible and using PrEP among attendees at our large sexual health service in Brighton, UK.

    There were …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors DR and SR designed this study; SR, JC, CF, DR collected the data; SR and DR analysed the data; and all authors contributed to the final manuscript.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.