Article Text

other Versions

Original article
Modelling the effect of Chlamydia trachomatis testing on the prevalence of infection in England: what impact can we expect from the National Chlamydia Screening Programme?
  1. Matthew David Dorey,
  2. Yoon Hong Choi,
  3. Kate Soldan,
  4. Emilia Vynnycky
  1. 1HIV/STI Department, Health Protection Agency, Colindale, London, UK
  2. 2Modelling and Economics Unit, Health Protection Agency, Colindale, London, UK
  3. 3Immunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department, Health Protection Agency, Colindale, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Matthew David Dorey, Modelling and Economics Unit, Health Protection Agency, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK; matt.dorey{at}hpa.org.uk

Abstract

  • Mathematical model
  • Chlamydia trachomatis
  • screening
  • epidemiology (general)
  • sexual networks
  • epidemiology
  • cervix
  • chlamydia

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Notice of Retraction

The authors and the editors are issuing a retraction of the article entitled “Modelling the effect of Chlamydia trachomatis testing on the prevalence of infection in England: what impact can we expect from the National Chlamydia Screening Programme?”, which was published online in Sexually Transmitted Infections on June 26, 2012 (DOI:10.1136/sextrans-2011-050126).

The authors noticed a coding error as a result of ongoing work using the model described in the article. They are working on a revised model and intend to publish a corrected version of the article when it is finalised. The editors of the journal, in agreement with the authors, have decided that the original version of the article should therefore be retracted.

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement: