Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Research Letter
Site and sex-specific differences in the effect of vitamin D on human papillomavirus infections: analyses of NHANES 2009–2014
  1. Avni Gupta1,2,
  2. Alessandro Villa3,4,
  3. Sarah Feldman5,
  4. Benjamin Citow6,
  5. Herve Sroussi3,4
  1. 1Global College of Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, USA
  2. 2Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  3. 3Oral Medicine and Dentistry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  4. 4Department of Oral Medicine Infection and Immunity, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  5. 5Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  6. 6Department of Arts and Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Avni Gupta, Global College of Public Health, New York University, New York, NY 10012, USA; avnigup07jan{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection with oncogenic HPV types (or the high-risk HPV types) is responsible for about 90% of anal and cervical cancers; 70% of oropharyngeal, vaginal and vulvar cancers; and more than 60% of penile cancers.1 Vitamin D seems to support the immune system by possible strengthening of innate and adaptive immune responses,2–4 and has been found to be protective against acute respiratory infections2 3 5 and cervicovaginal HPV infection among females.4 Here, we report the associations between vitamin D levels and HPV infection prevalence at oral, genital and anal sites of the high-risk and low-risk HPV types among men and women nationally in the USA. We used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics from 2009 to 2014. These cross-sectional surveys involve a household interview, followed by physical examination and laboratory testing in a mobile examination centre (MEC), and are nationally representative of the civilian, non-institutionalised US population. After excluding individuals who had received one or more dose of HPV vaccine, who had never had anal, vaginal or oral sex and who had missing/invalid results for vitamin D or HPV, 4620 males and 4343 females aged 18–59 years representing 68 920 825 and 63 480 356 individuals nationally were included in the analyses. HPV infection was categorised into low-risk (6, 11, 40, 42, 54, 55, 61, 62, 64, 67, 69, 70, 71, 72, 81, 82, 82 subtype IS39, 83, 84, 89(cp108)) and high-risk (16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68, 73 and 82) HPV types. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) (sum of 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3) indicated the vitamin D level which was categorised into <20 ng/mL (deficient) and ≥20 ng/mL (sufficient).4 MEC sample weights were used to provide national-level estimates. Relative risk (RR) of HPV infection in different groups was assessed using bivariate logistic regression models. We found that, among males, neither oral nor penile low-risk or high-risk HPV infections were significantly associated with vitamin D level. Among females, at cervical site, vitamin D deficiency was associated with a higher likelihood of both low-risk (1.41; 95% CI 1.23 to 1.61; p<0.001) and high-risk (1.25; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.49; p=0.014) HPV infection. However, only oral low-risk HPV infection (3.22; 95% CI 1.73 to 6.01; p<0.001) was more likely among vitamin D–deficient women (table 1). Sex and site differences in HPV infection are important because of the growing incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) which mainly affects males. Vitamin D has been shown to be an immunoregulator.6 Our findings indicate that vitamin D deficiency, which is speculated to be associated with immune dysregulation, might have less impact on high-risk oral HPV infection among males, and might imply different clearance and persistence propensity of HPV. This would suggest that males might be less likely to be affected by the immunomodulatory effects of vitamin D. The key clinical and research implication of this finding is that the control of OPSCC among men through prevention of HPV infection such as via HPV vaccine might need separate evaluations, instead of generalising the findings from HPV infections at other sites or among females.

Table 1

HPV infection in vitamin D–deficient and vitamin D–sufficient males and females

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Anna Maria Geretti

  • Twitter @avnigup07

  • Contributors All authors contributed to the conceptualisation of the manuscript along with data analysis/data inferences and manuscript writing/reviewing.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Disclaimer Abstract based on this manuscript was accepted for oral presentation at the International Association for Dental Research (IADR) conference at Vancouver (19 to 22 June 2019).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.