Article Text

Original research
Reduced sexual contacts with non-steady partners and less PrEP use among MSM in Belgium during the first weeks of the COVID-19 lockdown: results of an online survey
  1. Thijs Reyniers1,
  2. Anke Rotsaert1,
  3. Estrelle Thunissen2,
  4. Veerle Buffel2,
  5. Caroline Masquillier2,
  6. Ella Van Landeghem1,
  7. Jef Vanhamel1,
  8. Christiana Nöstlinger1,
  9. Edwin Wouters2,
  10. Marie Laga1,
  11. Bea Vuylsteke1
  1. 1 Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium
  2. 2 Department of Sociology, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
  1. Correspondence to Dr Thijs Reyniers, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen 2000, Belgium; treyniers{at}itg.be

Abstract

Objectives To examine changes in the occurrence of physical sex with non-steady partners among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Belgium during the first weeks of the COVID-19 lockdown and associations with sociodemographic factors, sexual practices, drug, alcohol and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use. A secondary objective was to explore changes in PrEP use and the need for PrEP follow-up.

Methods A cross-sectional online survey. The questionnaire was available in Dutch, French and English, between April 10 and 27 (2020), and disseminated via sexual health and lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer or intersex organisations throughout Belgium. Eligibility criteria included being 18 years or older, not being exclusively heterosexual and living or being born in Belgium.

Results The sample included 694 MSM. Physical sex with non-steady partners decreased from 59.1% to 8.9% during the first weeks of the lockdown. Those who had sex with non-steady partners were significantly more likely to be HIV positive, to use PrEP or to have engaged in sexual practices such as group sex, chemsex and sex work before the lockdown, compared with their counterparts. Among those who used PrEP before the lockdown, 47.0% stopped using PrEP, 19.7% used event-driven PrEP and 33.3% used daily PrEP during the lockdown. Almost two-thirds of PrEP users had a PrEP care appointment in the weeks before the lockdown and a minority received follow-up elsewhere or online. Some PrEP users had concerns regarding their follow-up.

Conclusions MSM in our survey substantially reduced sexual contact with non-steady partners during the first weeks of the COVID-19 lockdown, suggesting that the risk for HIV and STI transmission in this period was low. We recommend ensuring access to sexual health services, such as HIV testing and follow-up for PrEP for the small group having multiple sex partners and engaging in sexual practices such as chemsex, or group sex, even in times of a pandemic threat.

  • pre-exposure prophylaxis
  • sexual behaviour
  • HIV
  • preventive health services

Data availability statement

Data are not available due to ethical restrictions.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are not available due to ethical restrictions.

View Full Text

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Jo Gibbs

  • Contributors All authors were involved in setting up the study and data collection. TR and AR conducted the analysis. TR drafted the manuscript, and all authors commented on subsequent versions. All authors approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding TR is a postdoctoral fellow of the Research Foundation – Flanders. The study consortium received funding from the Research Foundation – Flanders as an SBO-project (S004919N).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.