Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Evaluating the use of reactivity levels to inform risk communication and improve service user experience in an HIV self-sampling service
  1. Jennifer Taylor1,2,
  2. Sally O'Brien1,2,
  3. Jamie Fagg1,2,
  4. Gillian Holdsworth2,
  5. Stuart Amos-Gibbs2,
  6. Elena Ardines3,
  7. Blake George2,
  8. Paula Baraitser2
  1. 1Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  2. 2SH:24 CIC, London, UK
  3. 3Analytics, SH:24 CIC, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sally O'Brien, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; sallyobrien{at}hotmail.co.uk

Abstract

Objectives This service improvement study scoped the value of using quantitative reactivity levels (RL) to introduce a two-tier counselling approach in HIV self-sampling services. The objectives were to (1) use self-reported confirmatory test results to estimate the positive predictive value (PPV) of the first-line assay and (2) to calculate the impact on the PPV and theoretical negative predictive value of a range of proposed RL thresholds, which could be used to differentiate between higher and lower reactive results.

Methods We studied HIV testing data from a UK-based online sexual health service from 1 December 2018 to 15 July 2020. Routinely collected, anonymised data on RL and self-reported confirmatory testing outcomes were used to calculate PPV at a range of RL thresholds.

Results 116 474 adequate HIV tests were reported during the study period, of which 889 were reactive (0.76%, 95% CI 0.71% to 0.82%). Confirmatory testing outcomes were self-reported by 572 (64.34%) reactive service users, of whom 43 (7.52%) had a new HIV diagnosis, 412 (72.03%) were negative and 117 (20.45%) already had a known HIV diagnosis. PPV was 9.45% at an RL threshold of >1. Quantitative RLs were reported for 30 281 results, of which 200 were reactive. PPV increased to 80% at an RL threshold of >30. No confirmed HIV diagnoses were reported among service users with RL <30.

Conclusion RLs could be used to support a more nuanced approach to counselling, potentially reducing anxiety prior to confirmatory testing.

  • HIV
  • counselling
  • delivery of health care
  • health services research
  • sexual health

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Sevgi O Aral

  • Contributors JT was responsible for protocol development, data cleaning and analysis, and manuscript preparation. SO’B was responsible for manuscript revision. GH and PB developed the protocol, edited the manuscript and oversaw the preparation of the manuscript. GH, PB, JT and SO’B are responsible for the overall content as guarantors. EA collated and analysed the data. SA-G collated the data and carried out internal clinical quality assurance. JF and BG edited the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.