Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Effect of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on chlamydia and gonorrhoea notifications and testing in Queensland, Australia: an interrupted time series analysis
  1. Marguerite Dalmau1,2,
  2. Robert Ware3,
  3. Emma Field2,
  4. Emma Sanguineti1,
  5. Damin Si1,
  6. Stephen Lambert1,4
  1. 1 Communicable Diseases Branch, Department of Health, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  2. 2 National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  3. 3 Menzies Health Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
  4. 4 National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Marguerite Dalmau, Communicable Diseases Branch, Department of Health, Queensland Health, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia; meg.dalmau{at}anu.edu.au

Abstract

Objective To investigate trends in testing and notifications of chlamydia and gonorrhoea during the COVID-19 pandemic in Queensland, Australia.

Methods Statewide disease notification and testing data between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2021 were modelled using interrupted time series. A segmented regression model estimated the pre-pandemic trend and observed effect of the COVID-19 pandemic response on weekly chlamydia notifications, monthly gonorrhoea notifications and monthly testing figures. The intervention time point was 29 March 2020, when key COVID-19 public health restrictions were introduced.

Results There were 158 064 chlamydia and 33 404 gonorrhoea notifications and 2 107 057 combined chlamydia and gonorrhoea tests across the 72-month study period. All three studied outcomes were increasing prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Immediate declines were observed for all studied outcomes. Directly after COVID-19 restrictions were introduced, declines were observed for all chlamydia notifications (mean decrease 48.4 notifications/week, 95% CI −77.1 to –19.6), gonorrhoea notifications among males (mean decrease 39.1 notifications/month, 95% CI −73.9 to –4.3) and combined testing (mean decrease 4262 tests/month, 95% CI −6646 to –1877). The immediate decline was more pronounced among males for both conditions. By the end of the study period, only monthly gonorrhoea notifications showed a continuing decline (mean decrease 3.3 notifications/month, p<0.001).

Conclusion There is a difference between the immediate and sustained impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on reported chlamydia and gonorrhoea notifications and testing in Queensland, Australia. This prompts considerations for disease surveillance and management in future pandemics. Possible explanations for our findings are an interruption or change to healthcare services during the pandemic, reduced or changed sexual practices or changed disease transmission patterns due to international travel restrictions. As pandemic priorities shift, STIs remain an important public health priority to be addressed.

  • chlamydia infections
  • gonorrhea
  • epidemiology

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Disease notification data are available on request from Queensland Health, following receipt of required ethics, governance and Public Health Act (2005) approvals.

This article is made freely available for personal use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.

https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usage

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Disease notification data are available on request from Queensland Health, following receipt of required ethics, governance and Public Health Act (2005) approvals.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Stefano Rusconi

  • Contributors MD, SL and EF conceptualised the study. MD designed the study, cleaned all data, performed statistical analyses and interpretation and prepared the manuscript. SL and EF supervised all stages of the study, with oversight of study design, interpretation and manuscript preparation. RW provided technical statistical advice. DS and ES provided intellectual input into the design. All authors contributed to the final manuscript and approved of the final version for submission. MD acts as guarantor for this article.

  • Funding MD was supported by a Master of Philosophy in Applied Epidemiology Scholarship funded by the Department of Health, Queensland Health, and administered by the Australian National University.

  • Disclaimer We declare that the views expressed in this submitted article are our own and not an official position of our affiliated institutions.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.